Founded 1993Six acquisitions since 2019£60m+ reported revenueConnect · Collaborate · SecureNet zero target: 2030

Company profile / Enterprise technology

Charterhouse Is the Plumbing Behind Britain’s Hybrid Office

The London technology group has spent three decades turning phones, networks, meeting rooms and security into one managed service. Its most persuasive product is not a box or an app - it is having one number to call when the whole stack misbehaves.

Advertisement

The useful thing about a telephone is that everyone notices when it fails. At Hallmarq Veterinary Imaging, the old office system made its limitations plain: more than two simultaneous calls could bring it down. Staff reached for mobiles, mobile coverage was patchy, and the company’s giant scanners and X-ray equipment interfered with factory-floor Wi-Fi. A request to replace the phones became an examination of the entire nervous system of a business serving veterinary practices around the clock.

Charterhouse Group replaced more than the handset problem. It refreshed Hallmarq’s WAN, LAN and wireless network, mobiles and security; connected Microsoft Teams to an 8x8 cloud back end; and introduced contact-centre reporting. Bandwidth rose tenfold. The telling sentence in the case study is almost an aside: Hallmarq asked for a phone upgrade, but Charterhouse delivered an active-network refresh. That is the company in miniature.

33years from voice and data to converged IT
6acquisitions since 2019
£30kannual telephony savings reported by the Museum of London

A company built in the seams

Charterhouse was founded in 1993 by Mark Brooks-Wadham and David Doherty. The legal entity remains Charterhouse Voice & Data Limited, a name from the era when voice and data travelled down visibly different roads. Today, its pitch is organised around three verbs - connect, collaborate, secure - covering enterprise networks, cloud calling, meeting rooms, contact centres, mobile service, identity, firewalls, endpoint protection and ongoing support.

This is not software sold by the seat and left to fend for itself. Charterhouse mixes multi-year managed-service contracts with hardware, licences, consulting and implementation work. It sits between large vendors and the people expected to make their products coexist. Microsoft Teams may be the interface, but numbering, emergency calls, old analogue devices, room hardware, recording rules, Wi-Fi and a contact centre still have to work behind it. Charterhouse gets paid to own that awkward middle.

Competitors include broad UK integrators such as Softcat, Computacenter and Bytes, managed-service groups such as Node4 and Air IT, telecom specialists such as Gamma and Redcentric, and thousands of narrower Microsoft, Zoom or security partners. Charterhouse’s answer is breadth with a human-sized front door. Its own current materials put the business at 197 employees and revenue above £60 million. That is large enough to maintain certified specialists, but far smaller than the platforms it resells.

Mike Wardell, chief executive of Charterhouse Group
Mike Wardell runs a company whose newest products contain AI, but whose customers still judge it by a wonderfully analogue standard: did somebody answer?Mike Wardell / Chief executive

Private equity bought the expansion plan

August Equity invested in Charterhouse in late 2018. Muzinich added private debt in May 2019. Deal values were not disclosed, so the cost of the expansion cannot responsibly be reduced to a neat number. Its shape, however, is visible. Charterhouse bought NETconnection Systems and Lloyds Business Communications, then DXP and Symity, before acquiring cybersecurity specialist Pentesec in 2021. Those purchases supplied the networking, Microsoft Teams and security expertise needed to turn a communications reseller into a wider managed-infrastructure group.

The most recent move is different. In 2026, under chief executive Mike Wardell, Charterhouse acquired the Teleware brand and intellectual property. Its sixth acquisition since 2019 added Teams-native AI agents, customer-experience tools, voice recording and regulated communications, with capabilities extending across Teams and Zoom. Earlier deals largely added people and practices. Teleware adds technology that Charterhouse can shape.

“It is this technical knowledge and our trust in it that we have come to rely on as much as the products themselves.”Richard Smith, Chief Operating Officer, Hallmarq Veterinary Imaging

Vendor badges matter in this market because buyers cannot inspect every engineer. Symity was a finalist in Microsoft’s 2021 Meetings, Calling & Devices for Teams Partner of the Year award after deployments in more than 42 countries. Charterhouse won Extreme Networks UK & Ireland Partner of the Year and Westcon’s UK networking award in 2022. It became Zoom’s first UK Platinum Partner and was named Zoom Most Valuable Partner EMEA in 2024. Charterhouse also reports Microsoft Global Partner of the Year recognition for converged communications.

The badges reveal a tension. Charterhouse advertises choice, yet every implementation depends on a relatively small club of large vendors: Microsoft, Zoom, 8x8, Extreme, Mitel, Cisco, Palo Alto Networks, Check Point and others. Its independence is practical rather than absolute. It can select and integrate across platforms; it cannot repeal their road maps, pricing or outages.

The invoice is not the cost

St Paul’s Cathedral illustrates what changes a buyer’s mind. Its on-premise phone system lacked flexibility, while an upgrade required substantial investment. The pandemic then closed the building and sent roughly 100 staff home. Charterhouse moved voice, messaging, video, mobility and collaboration to 8x8, handled number porting and trained users. The cloud service carried a higher monthly charge, but the cathedral said its total cost was lower than the upgrade and delivered more functionality. Sticker price lost the argument to total ownership.

How the St Paul’s trade-off was described

Monthly fee
Higher
Total ownership
Lower
Capability
More

Directional only. St Paul’s published no contract value; it reported the relationship between costs and capability.

At the Museum of London, the hard figure is clearer. A previous provider was not delivering software updates, and account managers kept changing after an acquisition. The museum felt too small to be a priority. Charterhouse won the support tender, introduced SIP and resilient failover, trained the internal team, and helped reduce telephony costs by about £30,000 a year. What failed first was support, not necessarily technology. The savings followed from treating both as one system.

City, University of London presents the industrial-scale version: a seven-year-old Wi-Fi estate, more than 800 access points, multiple sites and a provider without enough in-house engineering depth. Charterhouse brought Extreme Networks expertise and later added a Check Point firewall refresh through Pentesec. Small Luxury Hotels presents the paper version: invoices in multiple currencies were printed, circulated, keyed into Sage and stored for seven years. Charterhouse used document management to replace that choreography with searchable workflows.

The useful part is the method

There is a copyable sequence beneath the case studies. Start with the failure users can describe. Trace every dependency around it. Price the cost of keeping the legacy estate, including support, carrier lines, manual labour and lost visibility. Preserve equipment that still earns its keep. Then consolidate suppliers only where a single owner can genuinely improve response and accountability. Finally, train the customer’s own staff; the Museum of London valued being able to make simple changes without opening a ticket.

A five-step audit worth borrowing

  1. Write down the first visible failure - dropped calls, dead zones, duplicate licences or paper queues.
  2. Map the hidden dependencies around it, including identity, carriers, devices, compliance and support.
  3. Compare total ownership costs, not merely monthly fees or purchase price.
  4. Phase migrations around expiring contracts instead of paying to cancel everything at once.
  5. Demand operational measures after launch: uptime, call handling, bandwidth, ticket response and adoption.

The conditions matter. A single integrator is most useful for a multi-site organisation with a mixed estate, scarce internal specialists and a real need for continuous support. It is less compelling for a tiny company living comfortably inside one cloud suite, or for a large enterprise with deep in-house platform teams and a deliberate multi-supplier strategy. Consolidation can also create a fresh dependency: one throat to choke is still one throat.

Charterhouse’s environmental promise deserves the same operational scrutiny. It targets net-zero emissions by March 2030 and an 83 per cent reduction across Scopes 1, 2 and 3 from its 2022 baseline before offsetting residual emissions. It cites office moves, a cloud-first procurement policy, fewer legacy servers, flexible work and an electric-vehicle scheme. The difficult part will be the supply chain - precisely where an integrator’s footprint spreads across other companies’ hardware, data centres and logistics.

From dial tone to AI agent

The arc from 1993 to Teleware is not a pivot away from phones. It is an argument that the phone call has expanded. It now crosses an app, a contact centre, a compliance recorder, an identity policy, a wireless network and perhaps an AI agent before reaching a person. Each additional layer creates another vendor boundary. Charterhouse has built its business by occupying those boundaries.

That makes the company easy to underestimate. There is no beloved consumer product and little reason for the public to know its name. Yet its customers include hospitals, universities, manufacturers, professional firms, a cathedral and a museum. Their technology becomes visible mainly when it interrupts the work. Charterhouse sells the opposite sensation: the quiet absence of friction. In enterprise IT, boring can be a premium service.

Keep digging