THE BRIEFING
● FINANCIAL CONTROLS / APPROVALMAX● 2026: USAGE-BASED PRICING ROLLOUT● XERO · QUICKBOOKS ONLINE · NETSUITE● FROM INVOICE TO SIGN-OFF

Company / Fintech / SaaS

ApprovalMax puts a checkpoint before the money leaves

The accounting software knows what you spent. ApprovalMax tackles who agreed to it - turning invoice chases, purchase orders and payment approvals into a record a finance team can actually follow.

Advertisement

Somewhere between receiving an invoice and paying it, a business has to answer a deceptively small question: who said yes? At reusable-cup maker KeepCup, email approvals could be skipped. The result included duplicate payments, missed payments and too little visibility into what had been quoted versus what was paid. Moving the books into software had not made the decision trail dependable.

ApprovalMax sells a way to make that trail routine. The company connects financial documents to the people authorised to approve them, records their decisions and passes information between its workflows and accounting platforms. Its appeal lies in a familiar office indignity: skilled people spending their day nudging other skilled people to click something.

The invoice was digital. The chase was not.

KeepCup began rebuilding its finance technology in November 2024. Its setup came to include ApprovalMax Capture, approvals and Xero. Incoming invoices went through sign-off before flowing into the accounts. The company’s published story reports 300 invoices a month and 6.25 working days saved monthly. Those are customer-reported results, but the underlying problem is easy to recognise: an inbox is a poor place to establish whether an obligation has been checked.

That distinction explains the market ApprovalMax occupies. Accounting software can hold a transaction while the conversation about it remains scattered across messages, attachments and people’s memories. ApprovalMax gives that conversation a prescribed route. It addresses accounts payable, where suppliers must be paid, and parts of accounts receivable, where quotes and customer invoices need internal agreement.

The decision sits beside the ledger

For Xero users, the connection synchronises financial documents into approval workflows. Rules determine who receives a request. Bill-to-purchase-order matching helps reviewers compare an invoice with what was ordered; budget checking adds spending context. The useful idea is that the person responsible for a purchase should see the evidence while there is still a decision to make.

QuickBooks Online and Oracle NetSuite connections extend the same proposition to different accounting environments. Approvers can work outside the ledger, reducing the need to give everyone accounting-system access just to review a document. That is a specific advantage for businesses where operational managers understand the purchase but do not maintain the books.

Yoco offers a telling example. The payments company moved from Xero to NetSuite in October 2023 and retained ApprovalMax. Its published case describes 32 approvers and rules involving vendors, amounts and cost centres. Continuity mattered: changing the accounting system did not require abandoning the way spending authority was organised.

“We don’t need to pay someone to set up the workflows for us”Derek Martin, Yoco · customer interview

The product’s expertise is in making those rules configurable by the finance team. Alongside it sit broader AP and spending alternatives such as BILL, Tipalti, Coupa, Procurify and Ramp. The comparison depends on the job: a business shopping for an approval process has a different brief from one selecting an entire purchasing or payments system.

A builder gets its afternoons back

BLR Construction’s account of its old process is particularly concrete. The Australian builder handled up to 500 bills and invoices monthly, with paper approvals consuming decision-makers’ time and burdening the finance administrator. In its ApprovalMax case study, average approval time fell from 3.5 weeks to 4.5 days. The company reports more than 50 hours saved each month.

BLR Construction · reported approval time
Before 3.5 weeks
After 4.5 days
Less waiting for ink. BLR reports a 74% reduction. Bar lengths reflect that reported reduction; working-week conventions can affect comparisons.

BLR estimates annual savings of AUD 22,000. Treat that as a business’s valuation of its improvement, rather than cash guaranteed to every buyer. Time saved becomes valuable when the team can actually redeploy it. A faster approval is also useful to a supplier waiting for payment, even when nobody removes a salary from the payroll.

The evidence points to the first thing that failed: coordination. More documents meant more signatures to chase. The software replaced the chase with a visible queue and assigned responsibility. For a construction business, that also made spending easier to follow across projects.

The accountant who untangled 80 files

At creative agency NOUS, the problem had acquired folders. Its 20-person team used a process with as many as four approval steps; some folders contained up to 80 files. Administrators had to inspect PDFs and confirm sign-offs before payment. Tinka Consulting helped move the detailed rules into ApprovalMax, preserving oversight while automating the hand-offs.

The story illustrates another part of the business model: accountants are both customers and a route to customers. They already know where a client’s process becomes awkward. ApprovalMax’s partner programme offers support, discounts and training, giving practices a way to standardise how they help clients organise approvals.

That creates an advisory task beyond installing an app. Somebody must translate the client’s policy into a working matrix, decide which exceptions need escalation and teach approvers what to inspect. The software can carry those decisions through the month. It cannot decide what the company’s delegation policy ought to be.

What the subscription actually measures

ApprovalMax charges for software subscriptions by organisation. For a historical price anchor, its December 2025 notice listed new monthly GBP prices of £43 for Standard, £71 for Advanced and £96 for Premium, excluding tax. Those figures describe that schedule, not a universal September 2026 quote. Region, contract and the subsequent pricing rollout matter.

During 2026, ApprovalMax introduced usage tiers. Feature plans are divided into Small, Medium and Large sizes. Its help centre defines the two counters: fully approved documents and active approvers. Rejected or cancelled requests do not count as approved documents; an approved batch-payment request counts as one. An active approver is someone who approves at least one document during the billing cycle.

The company scheduled existing-customer migration to start at renewals from August 3, 2026. Capture becomes included under the new model, and eligible UK Xero customers also receive Open Banking Pay. Excess document usage incurs automatic overages. The practical consequence is that buying decisions need a realistic month’s activity, including occasional approvers and busy periods.

This is also a documented change of mind. Chief executive Konstantin Bredyuk argues that flat pricing treated light and heavy users alike, while the product had expanded. A customer can agree with that logic and still need to check the bill. More activity now has a more direct relationship with subscription cost.

A £10 million vote for financial controls

Bredyuk founded the business with Helmut Heptner and Peter Volynsky. Their leadership roles span chief executive, finance and technology. After operating on self-funding, ApprovalMax announced £10 million in primary growth investment from Yttrium, reported in January 2025. The investor also acquired a secondary stake of undisclosed size.

The company identified engineering, product development and international expansion as uses for the money. Capture and Pay had already arrived in June 2024, widening the offering beyond approval routing. Today its website reports more than 20,000 businesses. The direction is clear: cover more of the work surrounding the decision, from reading the document to carrying out a supported payment.

People at a mountain summit holding an ApprovalMax flag
One approval flag, considerable altitude. A photograph on the company’s careers page takes the workplace beyond the home office.

ApprovalMax describes a remote-first culture and lists customer focus, teamwork, innovation and execution among its values. Its stated mission is to make strong financial controls accessible to businesses of different sizes. That ambition fits its customer mix: the buyer may be a small practice, while the approval problem can span multiple entities and countries.

The permissions still belong to people

The product’s boundaries are as instructive as its features. ApprovalMax’s documentation says account owners and administrators can force a final approval or rejection. That makes privileged access part of the control design. An organisation still needs to decide who receives those powers and how their use is reviewed.

Payment details need their own checks. In the Airwallex integration, ApprovalMax documents a control that blocks batch-payment approval if beneficiary details are subsequently changed manually in Airwallex. This is the sort of narrow, concrete safeguard that matters more than a broad promise to prevent fraud. Its usefulness depends on using the relevant workflow.

Mobile access introduces another practical condition. The Android app supports approvals, comments and purchase-order creation, but workflows must first be configured in the web app. Responding to a June 2026 review, the company said mobile-browser approvals were not supported and pointed to app, email and Slack options. Teams should test the channels their approvers actually use.

Receivables work has its own purpose. ApprovalMax can route sales quotes and invoices for review, maintain version history and synchronise approved information. That helps a business agree prices and terms internally before communicating with a customer. It does not, by itself, make a slow-paying customer pay promptly.

Start with the rule, then buy the tool

The most transferable example comes from The Icehouse. Its published workflow uses three approval levels, with invoices above NZD 1,000 escalating to the chief operating officer. The amount is specific to that business. The lesson travels: write the threshold and the responsible role clearly enough that a system can route the decision without interpretation.

For a prospective buyer, the sensible trial is an ordinary invoice, an exception and a document that needs several people. Follow each from receipt to decision. Check who can see it, who can change it and what remains in the record. A business with little approval complexity may gain less from another subscription. For a team buried in reminders, however, the opportunity is wonderfully practical: spend less time finding the person who can say yes.

See the workflow for yourself