The little face on the dashboard presents an unexpectedly serious design problem. NIO’s NOMI has to seem approachable without becoming an annoyance. It has to belong in a premium car while looking like something a passenger might talk to. An engineering specification can describe a display. Describing a personality takes another sort of work. This is a useful place to meet Star.
- The job: connect business strategy, product design and software delivery.
- The customers: companies building cars, payment systems, health technology and advertising tools.
- The lesson: test the experience early, with the people who must eventually build it.
First, give the dashboard a face
NIO’s Munich design team already had use cases when Star joined the NOMI project. The collaborators tried cardboard mockups to judge size and position, illuminated models to explore its presence, and video prototypes to test movement. Star supplied design specifications for motion and visuals; NIO implemented the hardware and software. The distinction matters. This was a collaboration with a defined contribution.

NOMI Mate 1.5 received a Red Dot Product Design Award in 2020. The award description emphasizes voice control, sensors and moving graphics. Think about what those ingredients require: physical form, behavior and software have to agree. For a buyer considering Star, that agreement is the product lesson worth examining.
The business hiding in the handoff
Star began in Silicon Valley in 2008 as Cogniance, founded by Juha Christensen, Michael Schreibmann and Sergii Gorpynich. Christensen’s explanation was personal: building startups had meant repeatedly assembling design and engineering help. In his 2020 account, the firm hired 40 people at the outset, with some of his own money behind it.
“We’re a consulting firm that thinks like a product company.”
Juha Christensen / founder interview, 2020
The company became Star in February 2019. Its rebrand announcement argued for tighter integration between strategy, design, engineering and marketing. Today it sells business consulting, experience design, custom development, cloud and data work, and AI services. Its model is professional services, including continuing development relationships. Customers buy expertise and delivery capacity for their own products.
That puts Star in the territory occupied by integrated design and engineering consultancies, alongside alternatives such as an internal product team or a design studio paired with developers. Its proposition rests on continuity: the people investigating a problem remain connected to the people making the solution. The appeal depends on how much coordination the client actually needs.
Seven countries. One shopping list.
Consider Paidy. The Japanese payments business wanted to extend its service into an in-app shopping experience. Star describes a remote team across seven countries bringing product, design, engineering and testing together. The MVP shipped in July 2021 after three months, with search, wishlists and an in-app browser among its features.
One Paidy engagement. Project figures reported by Star; not a delivery promise.
Paidy’s own July launch announcement describes an app covering discovery through payment. Star’s account supplies the less glamorous machinery: demonstrations for management, retrospectives and recurring meetings across disciplines. The useful inference is about decision speed. A distributed team needs a common view of what is being built, and regular opportunities to correct that view.

The plumbing gets a vote
Monavate offers the quieter version of the same story. Star’s first work on its payment platform began with six weeks of discovery involving a product lead, architect and designer. Development followed, including APIs and integrations. Later, as additional processors and providers increased complexity, Monavate asked Star to redesign its data warehouse.
What came under strain first was maintenance and data accuracy. Star’s account describes translation problems between data sources. The response included revising data models and transformation processes while reusing and refactoring sound components. That is a more useful buying signal than a promise to replace everything: the team had to distinguish the parts causing trouble from the parts worth keeping.
The collaboration earned Juniper Research’s 2023 Platinum award for Banking-as-a-Service Innovation. The broader point is operational. An attractive interface still depends on information arriving in a usable form. Financial products make that dependency hard to ignore.
At BMW, Star applied a related combination to an internal Cloud Data Hub visualization tool. The brief included non-technical employees, and the work had to fit existing infrastructure. Star reports delivery in under six months. At ViralGains, it built a drag-and-drop campaign prototype and worked on bidding models. Across these projects, usability and engineering constraints share the brief.
Borrow the sequence
Star calls its planning approach “Endgame Thinking”: choose a long-term destination, then work backwards. Readers can borrow a modest version without hiring anybody. Write down the user outcome. Make a prototype that exposes the uncertain interaction. Put someone responsible for implementation in the review. Decide which existing components deserve to survive.
- 01Define the outcome
- 02Test the interaction
- 03Connect the systems
- 04Improve after launch
The approach asks something of the buyer, too. A combined team needs access to systems, users and decision-makers. If approvals remain isolated in separate departments, putting several disciplines on one supplier’s invoice will accomplish little. For a narrowly specified task, a smaller specialist may also be sufficient. Those are practical limits to the model.
A new wave, a familiar problem
Star’s current positioning emphasizes AI. In August 2026, it announced a healthcare and life sciences advisory board with clinical, pharmaceutical, payer and technology experience. The move recognizes that technical delivery in healthcare requires knowledge of the setting in which a product will operate. It is consistent with the company’s longstanding argument for bringing different expertise together.
The test for Star remains concrete: can those perspectives produce something people can use, inside the constraints of a real business? A dashboard face is one answer. A working payment platform is another. Both demand careful decisions at the joins.