Breaking
ADALO — no-code app builder shipping native iOS & Android 223,000+ makers registered on the platform $8M Series A led by Tiger Global Adalo 3.0 reports apps running 3–4× faster Named after Ada Lovelace, the first programmer Flat-rate pricing — same cost at 100 or 100,000 users Founded 2018 · St. Louis, Missouri
Company Profile · No-Code

Adalo Wants You to Ship an App Without Writing Code

The St. Louis startup - named after the first programmer - turned drag-and-drop into a real path to the App Store. Its bet: ideas are more common than the ability to build them.

There is a specific kind of frustration that Adalo was built to kill. You have an idea for an app. You can picture the screens. And then you hit the wall: databases, authentication, App Store review, a developer you can't afford. Most ideas die right there, at the gap between "I can picture it" and "it's on the phone." Adalo's entire reason to exist is to close that gap - and to do it without a single line of code.

Founded in 2018 in St. Louis, Missouri by David Adkin, Ben Haefele, and Jeremy Blalock, Adalo is a no-code app builder. You design apps on a visual, drag-and-drop canvas, connect them to a built-in database, wire up the logic with menus instead of syntax, and publish the result as a real native app to the Apple App Store and Google Play - or as a web app - from a single project. Two of the three founders were non-technical when they started. That is not a footnote to the story. It is the story. They built the tool they wished had existed when they had an idea and no way to ship it.

The name is a tell, too. Adalo is drawn from Ada Lovelace, widely credited as the first computer programmer. A company named after the original coder, built so that people never have to code. If you want the thesis in one word, it's on the door.

2018
Founded
223k+
Makers
$9.7M
Raised
~30
Team

What it actually doesAn app, minus the plumbing

The useful way to understand Adalo is to separate the two halves of building software. There's the part you can see - screens, buttons, lists, the flow between them. And there's the part you can't - the database that stores users and records, the accounts and passwords, the payment handling, the machinery that submits a finished app to two different app stores with two different sets of rules. The visible part is where the fun is. The invisible part is where projects go to die.

Adalo bundles the invisible part into the tool. Every app gets a database out of the box, so a maker can store users, orders, and records without standing up any outside infrastructure. User sign-up and login are built in. Payments run through a Stripe integration; automations run through Zapier; anything else can come in over a custom API. When the app is ready, Adalo compiles it to native code and hands you a path straight to the App Store and Google Play.

Adalo's pitch isn't "design a pretty screen." Plenty of tools do that. It's "design the screen, and we'll carry the database, the login, and the App Store submission." The value is in the plumbing, not the paint

On top of the canvas, Adalo has folded in AI as a co-pilot rather than an autopilot. A feature called MagicStart scaffolds an app's database and structure from a description; MagicAdd generates new components and screens inside a project you're already working in. The interesting part of these features isn't "type a prompt, get magic." It's that they remove the tedious 40% - the blank-page setup - while leaving the maker in the driver's seat.

Who it's forThe person stuck at the bottleneck

Adalo's customer is anyone whose bottleneck is a developer they don't have. Solo founders building a first MVP. Small businesses that need a members app or a booking tool. Agencies spinning up client apps. Product teams standing up internal tools without pulling engineers off the roadmap. Community organizers who want their group in a pocket instead of a group chat. The platform has reported more than 223,000 registered makers, and at points tens of millions of monthly active end users across the apps built on it.

What connects them is a shared shape of problem: the idea is clear, the budget for custom development is not. Adalo is a bet that ideas are far more common than the ability to ship them - and that if you hand the second thing to more people, a lot of the first thing gets built.

Adalo 3.0 — reported app performance shift
Before 3.0
baseline
After 3.0
~3–4× faster
Late-2025 engine rebuild; company reports 40–70% CPU reduction. Figures are Adalo's own.

Picking a laneNative, while the rest chased web

The no-code space is crowded, and the easy mistake is to try to be everything. Adalo made a narrower choice. Its rivals split along clear lines: Bubble owns complex, deeply customizable web apps for people willing to learn a steeper tool. Glide owns fast internal tools built off spreadsheets. FlutterFlow appeals to makers who want to eventually export code and take ownership. Adalo planted its flag on true native mobile - real iOS and Android apps, published to both stores, from one project.

Adalo
Native iOS + Android + web, published to both app stores from one project.
Bubble
Deeply customizable web apps; more power, steeper learning curve.
Glide
Fast internal tools built from spreadsheets; light and template-driven.
FlutterFlow
Generates Flutter apps you can export - a no-code start with a code exit.

The lesson underneath the comparison is a familiar one for anyone building a product: a narrow lane you fully own beats a wide lane you share. Adalo isn't trying to win "no-code." It's trying to win "I want a native app and I can't code," which is a smaller room where it's a much bigger presence.

The businessBetting against the meter

Adalo runs a freemium SaaS model. A free tier lets you build and preview apps; paid plans, starting around $36 a month, unlock app-store publishing, custom domains, more actions, and integrations. Enterprise plans and add-ons sit on top.

The pricing itself is a feature, and a pointed one. Adalo leans on flat-rate plans - the bill stays the same whether an app has 100 monthly active users or 100,000. Anyone who has watched a usage-based invoice balloon overnight understands why that's a selling point rather than a compromise. It's a direct jab at the workload-metered pricing that can make a successful app suddenly expensive on other platforms. Adalo is betting that makers value a predictable number over a flexible one.

Same cost at 100 users or 100,000. In a category where success can trigger a scary invoice, "predictable" is the pitch. On flat-rate pricing

On the money side, Adalo raised an $8M Series A in 2021, led by Tiger Global, with Oceans Ventures, OldSlip Group, and angels including Zapier's Wade Foster and Ben Tossell - one of the larger Series A rounds the no-code app space had seen at the time. Total disclosed funding sits around $9.7M, and the team is small, roughly 30 people, run product-first with a heavy community focus.

Where it's headedRaising the ceiling

The oldest knock on no-code is "you'll outgrow it and have to rebuild." It's a fair worry - database-heavy apps with thousands of concurrent users can strain the platform, and you can't export Adalo's underlying source code to host it yourself. Adalo's answer has been to keep raising the ceiling so that "outgrow it" arrives later and later.

The clearest sign of that was Adalo 3.0, a late-2025 rebuild of the app engine that the company says cut CPU use by 40 to 70% and made apps roughly three to four times faster - unglamorous infrastructure work that rarely makes headlines but is the difference between a demo that impresses and an app people keep open. It arrived alongside a leadership change: James Crennan, based in Sydney, stepped in as CEO to steer the next chapter, one built around speed and support. Among no-code tools, the ones worth watching are the ones investing in the ceiling, not just the on-ramp. Adalo is spending on both.

no-codeapp buildernative apps iosandroidsaas startupsdrag & dropai app builder st. louis