NEWS / ARCHIVE
COMPANY / MARKETING TECHNOLOGYTHE 2015 PROPOSITION

Accomplice.IO wanted your ads to answer to the cash register

In 2015, Accomplice.IO put campaign creation, website tracking and budget optimization under one roof. Its wager: marketers needed fewer disconnected tools and a clearer route from attention to action.

The sweater is a useful place to begin. In an archived Accomplice.IO screen, a sample clothing campaign has a creative brief, a strategy document and two goals: more website visits and more signups. Beside them sit Facebook and AdWords accounts. It looks like office work, which is precisely the point. Somewhere between choosing an advertisement and counting a sale, marketing had acquired a great deal of office work.

THE STORY IN FOUR LINES
  • A platform connecting campaign creation to website actions.
  • Built for brand and agency marketing teams.
  • Plans started at $249/month in 2015, with unlimited seats.
  • Customer WME | IMG joined a $5 million Series A.

Accomplice.IO’s proposition was to bring those tasks together. Its historical product belongs in the space between ad management and marketing analytics: a place where someone must decide what to run, find out what happened and decide what deserves another dollar. The appealing part was the attempt to shorten the distance between those decisions.

A purchase button, rather than applause

Consider a hypothetical retailer. One campaign attracts inexpensive clicks; another attracts fewer visitors who actually buy. A report celebrating the first campaign may be perfectly accurate and commercially unhelpful. The useful question is what the advertiser asked the software to reward. Attention and revenue can be friendly acquaintances without being close relations.

Accomplice’s interface made business goals visible inside the project. Its sample sweater campaign requested 500 additional site visits and a 10 percent increase in signup conversions. Those numbers are example targets, not demonstrated results. Their significance is architectural: the destination was present before the campaign’s performance report arrived.

Archived Accomplice project screen showing campaign documents, website goals and connected advertising accounts
A sweater with a business plan. The archived project screen gives the campaign documents, connected accounts and explicit goals. Example targets, not a victory lap.

Sinan Mouline, an engineer who worked on the platform, describes a builder with three stages. First came the campaign’s budget, bidding approach and duration. Next came audiences and creative, with combinations saved as reusable templates. Finally, the software checked the information and offered feedback about the budget and timeframe. His account puts practical machinery behind the integrated-platform pitch.

Reusable combinations matter because a campaign is rarely a single choice. An image can perform differently with different audiences. Saving the pair gives the next campaign a starting point and makes the work easier to repeat. The interface was arranging experiments as well as arranging advertisements.

The small script carrying a large ambition

The other half of the product lived on the customer’s website. Developer Tarik Kaldzija lists work on a user-tracking script and an onsite event-selector toolbar. A design retrospective describes a visual tagger that let customers select the interactions they wanted to measure. A purchase button, a signup or a video interaction could become a concrete destination for campaign activity.

A separate developer account names Facebook, Twitter, Google AdWords and Instagram among the campaign channels. It also describes modules for insights, activities and reports. Accomplice was therefore attempting more than a tidy front door for several advertising accounts. It wanted the work behind that door to share a destination.

For a buyer assessing such software, the distinction matters. Publishing tools help get something out. Reporting tools help explain what came back. Connecting those functions can let a team change its next decision while the campaign is still running. That is the practical attraction of Accomplice’s design, rather than any particular ornament on its dashboard.

Accomplice design screen with choices for Facebook engagement, followers, video views and offers
Choose your applause carefully. This product design makes social engagement, followers, video views and offers separate goals.

The customer who bought into the company

The company began as Fractal Sciences. A contemporaneous founder interview dates its formation to 2013 and names Lior Tamir, Brian Lewis, Idan Benaim and Shaun Porcar. Tamir was CEO; Lewis was president and chief data scientist. In March 2015, Accomplice announced a $5 million Series A that included WME | IMG.

WME | IMG already used the product. That makes the financing an interesting form of customer feedback: an organization buying the service also put capital behind its development. It is evidence of a commercial relationship and confidence in the company, though an investment cannot tell us how much money an individual campaign saved.

A January 2016 interview description also names Viacom and Indiegogo as users. The intended audience extended from smaller businesses to enterprise marketing departments and agencies. Advertisers, social managers and analysts each had a reason to enter the same workspace, even when their daily tasks differed.

A subscription priced for company

The March 2015 starting price was $249 a month, with unlimited seats and social channels. Treat that as a historical offer. The unlimited-seat detail carries an argument of its own: shared campaign work becomes awkward when the people responsible for it cannot all get inside the software.

Accomplice positioned itself against the marketing suites of Salesforce, Adobe and Oracle. Its founders argued that building an integrated system from the beginning produced a more coherent workflow. That was the company’s competitive case. For a prospective customer, the sensible test would have been to follow one real campaign through creation, measurement and revision, watching where manual reconciliation returned.

“More precise targets will make your content more relevant and convert more often than broader categories.”

Lior Tamir, discussing advertising tactics for 2016 in Inc.

What travels beyond the dashboard

The design retrospective describes interviews with campaign and account managers, iterative sketches and a largely solo designer. Mouline recalls organizing a culture club, dinners and movie nights. These are small glimpses of the people doing the work, more useful than a grand declaration about company culture.

The portable lesson is to agree on the outcome before automating the spend. With an unmeasured purchase, a poorly chosen event or too few meaningful responses, a neat dashboard can still guide a bad decision. This is a limitation of the approach, not a documented Accomplice failure. The sweater screen offers a modest discipline anyone can borrow: put the goal beside the work, where everyone has to see it.

Open the original conversation

COMPANY LINKS & FURTHER READING