Breaking profile   Kevin Leahy: reporter to fundraising-tech CMOStory first   jargon last   the problem before the productGivzey + Version2   Boston   autonomous fundraising

Person / Marketing / Fundraising Technology

Kevin Leahy Learned to Sell the Future by Writing the Present

A former reporter turned fundraising-tech marketer, Leahy treats every product claim like a story that still has to earn its ending. At Givzey and Version2, that means translating autonomous AI into the stubborn, human problems nonprofit teams face every day.

Kevin Leahy spent the first stretch of his career asking the sort of questions that refuse to be impressed by a pitch deck. Local reporting will do that to a person. A claim needs a name. A deadline needs a date. A grand plan eventually has to arrive somewhere ordinary, where a reader can point to it and say: yes, that is happening here. Two decades later, Leahy markets software that promises autonomous fundraising, a phrase with enough altitude to make any sensible editor reach for a red pen. His instinct is to bring it back down to earth.

The earth, in this case, is a nonprofit office with more donors than fundraisers have time to know. It is an advancement team watching good prospects linger outside a portfolio. It is a verbal pledge waiting for documentation, or a lapsed donor receiving another generic message because no employee has an afternoon to spare. Leahy's work at Givzey and its AI operation, Version2, begins in that crowded room. The technology enters only after the problem has taken a seat.

“Storytelling, it’s the very heart of what marketing is.”Kevin Leahy, speaking in 2025

The first draftA reporter learns where the fog gathers

Leahy's public career record starts with newspapers around Wakefield, Massachusetts. He reported for the Wakefield Daily Times Chronicle in 2000 and 2001, then for the Wakefield Daily Item from 2002 to 2006. He studied at Merrimack College and completed a master's degree at Syracuse University. There was also a 2006 turn writing scripts for a Major League Baseball operation. The sequence suggests someone learning several forms of compression: the news lead, the clean quote, the sports segment that has to land before the clock does.

After managing at the YMCA of Greater Boston, he worked as a metadata specialist at Digitalsmiths. The title sounds like an abrupt left turn, but metadata and reporting share a quiet obsession: things must be named correctly before they can be found. By 2012 he was working in technology communications at LaunchSquad, appearing as a press contact on product announcements and later in Boston's startup community. The beat had widened. The basic task had not. Complicated companies still needed a sentence that a hurried person could understand.

  1. Newsroom years. Reporting in Wakefield, with a period of sports scriptwriting.
  2. Operations and information. YMCA management, followed by metadata work at Digitalsmiths.
  3. Technology communications. LaunchSquad and the Boston startup scene.
  4. Fundraising AI. Marketing leadership at Gravyty, ultimately as vice president.
  5. A new category. Marketing leadership at Givzey and Version2.

The second beatFundraising technology, before it was fashionable

At Gravyty, Leahy moved into a peculiar editorial territory: artificial intelligence for fundraisers. In 2018, AI in advancement was less a universally understood market than a collection of arguments about what computers should do and what human relationships must keep. Gravyty positioned its software as help for the repetitive work surrounding donor relationships. Leahy, first a director and later vice president of marketing, helped make the case in press releases, webinars, reports and partnerships.

His language could be provocative without pretending the tension did not exist. In 2020, he described automated donor communication as creating “the illusion of personalization,” then immediately added that this was not inherently bad. The point was capacity: technology could preserve more individual attention while fundraisers concentrated on the encounters requiring judgment. That same year, amid widespread disruption, he described Gravyty's crisis response in three crisp instructions: do not go dark, expand your reach, and ask, but adjust the ask. The old reporter's economy was still doing useful work.

Leahy also served as editorial director for the 2020 State of AI in Advancement report. When Gravyty was recognized on Inc.'s 2021 Best Workplaces list, his name sat on the media contact line. These are unglamorous coordinates of an operator's influence. Marketing leadership is often visible in the chief executive's quotation, the report's logic, the event that appears inevitable after somebody has spent weeks making it occur. Leahy's fingerprints are usually in the framing.

Kevin Leahy, right, speaking with Matt Crane during an episode of The Lantern
The two-item growth plan, caught mid-sentence: Kevin Leahy, right, joins Matt Crane on The Lantern in March 2025. A yellow legal pad waits beneath the laptop, because even autonomous fundraising occasionally begins with handwriting.

The category problemHow to market a job title that belongs to software

Leahy joined Givzey's marketing leadership in 2022, reuniting with founder Adam Martel after their Gravyty years. Givzey was then associated with flexible giving and digital gift agreements. Its ambition soon expanded into intelligent gift documentation: reducing the procedural muddle between a donor saying yes and an institution recording, signing and stewarding the commitment. Leahy called this stretch the “messy middle.” It is a good marketer's phrase because it dignifies no software feature. It names the customer's annoyance.

Then came Version2 and an even stranger assignment. Its Virtual Engagement Officers were designed to manage donor portfolios, communicate transparently as AI representatives, and guide individualized journeys toward outcomes that might include a gift. The proposition invited obvious suspicion. Fundraising prizes relationships. A virtual officer sounds, at first hearing, like a contradiction with a login.

Leahy's answer has been to refuse the abstract debate when a practical one is available. In a 2025 interview, he said customers were less concerned with adding AI than with solving a staffing problem they had carried for decades. That distinction is the center of his pitch. Nobody needs another intelligent adjective wandering through a budget meeting. They need a donor to receive attention, a fundraiser to recover time, and a pipeline to keep moving.

The message travels from pain to proof

Leahy's recurring narrative logic
A four-stage narrative from staffing gap to measured result Four connected stages show staffing gap, donor attention, digital capacity, and measured result. STAFFINGGAP DONORATTENTION DIGITALCAPACITY MEASUREDRESULT

Proof enters the copyThe numbers become plot points

The benefit of marketing a system already at work is that the story acquires verbs. In January 2025, Leahy chronicled an early Version2 milestone: $275,045 raised through 1,600 donor engagements and 27,249 donor activities in three months. The company reported a 0.12 percent opt-out rate. By March, he was writing about lapsed donors: 15 percent of those who had given under early virtual-officer management came from lapsed groups, accounting for more than $100,000 and 21 percent of total giving in that analysis.

$275KRaised in an early three-month autonomous-fundraising report
0.12%Reported opt-out rate during the early milestone
$10M+Autonomous revenue milestone announced in March 2026

By March 2026, Version2 announced that its virtual engagement officers had crossed $10 million in fundraising revenue. A marketer could pile these figures into a triumphal heap. Leahy's more interesting move is to treat them as evidence in an unfinished case. Autonomous fundraising was only months old when he discussed it in 2025. Customers needed to learn from one another quickly. Wins had to be spotted, examined and broadcast. The numbers mattered because they helped a cautious market decide what question to ask next.

“Folks are less concerned about, hey, we need AI on our team, right, to, hey, we really need to solve this big problem.”Kevin Leahy on The Lantern

A compact operating manualHire the helpers. Sharpen the message.

Asked what building the brand and growth machine looked like, Leahy offered two ingredients: great hiring and messaging. His example of a good hire was not a résumé ornament. It was a colleague who hears another person's problem and leans toward it, looking for the part they can help solve. The behavior is collaborative, but it is also editorial. Good stories are built by people willing to notice what does not yet fit.

The messaging half is equally plain. The company must recognize customer wins and broadcast them in the right ways. “We have to be spot on in telling this story,” he said. Precision carries special weight when the product can act in a role previously held only by a person. A loose claim risks more than a muddled campaign. It confuses the boundary between assistance, autonomy and human judgment.

This is where Leahy's earlier career becomes more than an agreeable origin story. Reporting trained him to lead with the consequential detail. Public relations taught him how organizations speak under pressure. Fundraising technology forced him to narrate change inside a field protective of trust. Now, when artificial intelligence threatens to turn every company description into the same silver fog, he keeps returning to donors, staff and the next observable result. The nouns are human. The verbs have to prove themselves.

More chances for something meaningfulThe surface area of luck

Leahy's most revealing metaphor is “the surface area of luck.” Major-gift officers cultivate relationships through varied, repeated interactions. Each thoughtful contact creates another chance for a meaningful response. Donors outside those portfolios may receive only a few broad messages a year. Increase the frequency and relevance of contact, Leahy argues, and luck has more places to land.

It is a marketer's metaphor with a reporter's respect for opportunity. You cannot command the gift, the reply or the perfect anecdote. You can do the work that makes each more likely. Version2's bet is that software can expand that work without pretending the human encounters at the center of philanthropy are interchangeable. Leahy's bet is that the category will make sense when its story remains attached to those encounters.

His LinkedIn introduction begins, “Changing the world is difficult, but entirely worth it.” The phrase could buckle under its own weight. Leahy's career supplies a useful counterbalance: difficult work is usually made of small, reportable actions. Ask a better question. Hire the person who helps. Remove the vague sentence. Call the donor. Document the yes. Measure what happened. Then write the next draft with the modesty to admit there will be one.