Breaking Two clients at the first Pittcon pitchSignal 3,200 qualified leads in one reported quarterSince 2005 Science first, channels secondBreaking Two clients at the first Pittcon pitchSignal 3,200 qualified leads in one reported quarterSince 2005 Science first, channels second

Company Profile / Life Sciences Marketing

The Agency That Put on a Lab Coat

Most agencies know the language of persuasion. Brandwidth Solutions built a business by learning the language of the laboratory - then wiring every campaign to the sales pipeline.

The revealing moment in the Brandwidth Solutions story happened before there was much of a company to reveal. In January 2005, Debra Harrsch left Thermo Fisher Informatics. Then she went to Pittcon, the annual gathering where chromatography columns, spectrometers and laboratory software get the sort of attention normally reserved for new cars. She pitched. She came home with two clients.

This was less a leap into the unknown than a carefully aimed step into a gap Harrsch had seen from both sides of the conference table. She had spent two decades in sales and marketing for science and technology businesses, working with research teams and hiring outside agencies. The agencies could do the creative work. What they often could not do was follow the science without a tutorial. For a technical marketer, every hour spent teaching the agency what the product actually does is an hour not spent finding the person who might buy it.

“You actually understand the science.”Early client feedback recalled by Debra Harrsch

That sentence became the market test. Brandwidth was bootstrapped with industry relationships, Harrsch's sales instinct and support at home. She quickly outsourced bookkeeping - an admirably unromantic founder decision - and kept her attention on business development and the story. The new firm was not selling scientific decoration. It was selling the absence of translation friction.

Debra Harrsch, founder and CEO of Brandwidth Solutions
Debra Harrsch left the corporate laboratory circuit, took her Rolodex to Pittcon and returned with two clients. The silver jacket suggests this was not a timid experiment.

The first thing that failed was the handoff

In technical B2B marketing, the familiar agency handoff is unusually expensive. A scientist explains the product to a product manager, who explains it to a marketer, who explains it to a writer, who produces a sentence no scientist would say. Each transfer sands away meaning. Brandwidth's answer was to put industry veterans, scientific writers and marketing operators on the same side of the table.

The company now operates as a project shop, an extension of an in-house team or the marketing department itself. The menu is broad: positioning and brand systems; content and public relations; print, search and social advertising; websites and user experience; trade shows and webinars; automation, lead nurture and analytics. The breadth matters because the buyers are not wandering through a neat funnel. A laboratory director might encounter a trade article, download a white paper six weeks later, watch a webinar, ignore three emails, meet a sales rep at a conference and finally request a demo. The campaign has to remember the conversation even when the buyer does not.

One idea, many surfaces

The clearest example is Brandwidth's work for LabVantage, a laboratory informatics company selling across industries. Instead of beginning with an ad format, the agency began with three subjects that prospective buyers already found urgent: data integrity, digital transformation and cybersecurity. Those ideas became white papers, case studies, videos, podcasts and articles. Ads in 25 trade publications and on Google led to industry-specific landing pages. Public relations created a second route in. Social posts, events and automated email kept the subjects in circulation.

The useful trick was versioning. A pharmaceutical laboratory and a food manufacturer do not hear “digital transformation” in quite the same way, so Brandwidth changed the examples and entry points while holding the central claim steady. In the reported campaign, that system produced 5,535 leads, more than 400 demo requests and seven requests for quotation. A later quarterly snapshot of the integrated program counted 3,200 qualified leads, 140 demo requests and three six-figure opportunities.

3,200Qualified leads in one reported quarter
140Demo requests in that quarter
3Six-figure opportunities reported

This is what Brandwidth means by integrated. It is not the agency version of ordering everything on the menu. It is the decision to make each asset continue the work of the previous one. The white paper gives the ad something worth clicking. The landing page finishes the ad's sentence. The nurture sequence makes a download less anonymous. The trade show lets the digital story acquire a handshake.

When the booth disappeared

The system was tested when Pittcon's 2021 event went virtual. The physical booth - a dependable center of gravity for laboratory marketing - vanished. Brandwidth and LabVantage built a digital approximation with interactive material, live chat, two explainer videos, brochures, papers and case studies. They staged an online press conference for a product launch, wrote three releases and used their trade-media relationships to bring in 73 media registrants.

The virtual show generated nearly 200 leads, more than 1,100 Google ad impressions and over 4,500 impressions in the show's daily publication. The practical lesson was not “go virtual.” It was that the booth had never been the entire event. The valuable object was the connected sequence around it - anticipation, useful material, a news moment and follow-up. Once Brandwidth saw the event that way, the missing carpet mattered less.

The report stops arriving late

Integration creates its own nuisance: evidence lands in different cupboards. Marketing automation knows who opened an email. Google knows the click. LinkedIn knows the audience. A trade publisher knows the download. The website knows the visit. A quarterly spreadsheet arrives after the choices it was meant to improve have already been made.

In 2024, Brandwidth introduced LeadInsites, a proprietary platform that aggregates those signals into client-specific, near-real-time views. For LabVantage, it pulls from Marketo, paid media, social, web analytics and third-party programs. Leaders can examine leads by country or publication, compare webinar subjects, distinguish new demo requests from nurtured ones and move charts into board reporting. Work that once took hours or weeks can be assembled in minutes.

LeadInsites is also the company's most interesting strategic move. Brandwidth took the recurring pain created by its own full-service model - proving how all the pieces worked together - and made a product from it. The agency reported a 150 percent increase in clients using marketing automation and 57 percent workforce growth in the year around the launch. In 2024 it entered the Inc. 5000 at number 3,786. By 2026, Harrsch had been named a Philadelphia Titan 100 honoree.

What survives the laboratory

The company is small enough that the word “agency” can be misleading. Its public team combines a chief science officer, marketing strategists, content and PR specialists, media and digital directors, creative leadership and operations. Its market is narrower than its service list: contract pharma, biotech, diagnostics, medical devices, laboratory informatics and technical software. This is not a consumer-growth shop wearing safety glasses. Its advantage is strongest when the product is complex, the sales cycle is long and credibility compounds over repeated encounters.

The copyable part

Start with three problems the buyer already discusses. Build one substantial piece of material for each. Adapt the examples by vertical, not the underlying promise. Connect every distribution channel to a capture point. Agree with sales on what makes a lead useful. Then review the combined evidence often enough to change the campaign while it is still running.

That method is less persuasive when the purchase is impulsive, the audience is broad or the company has no access to subject-matter experts. It also becomes expensive choreography without reliable tracking, a usable CRM and a sales team willing to follow the leads. Integration is not automatically efficiency. It earns the name only when the pieces share a story and the organization can see what happened next.

Harrsch's original observation has aged well. Channels multiply. Algorithms become moody. AI makes average copy almost free. A technical buyer still wants to know whether the people speaking understand the thing they are describing. Brandwidth built a company around making the answer obvious - and then counting the people who leaned closer.