IN FOCUS
MEDIA INTELLIGENCE / THE HUMAN JUDGMENT BEHIND THE BRIEFDIGIMENT RESEARCH / FOUNDED JANUARY 2017

People / The business of paying attention

Biju D. Vincent and the Trouble With More

Biju D. Vincent built DigiMent Research around a practical conviction: a news mention becomes useful when someone understands it. His career is an argument for keeping human judgment in the monitoring business.

Advertisement

Apple is a perfectly serviceable name for a company until someone has to search for it. Then the orchard wanders into the office. Amazon and Box bring their own complications. Biju D. Vincent uses all three examples when explaining the trouble with preparing an executive news brief: a search can find precisely the word you asked for and still miss the thing you meant.

It is a small problem with a payroll attached. Someone must inspect the results, recognize the wrong context, remove the distractions, and decide what a busy reader needs to see. Vincent has made that work the premise of a company. He founded DigiMent Research in January 2017 to combine automation with human curation in media monitoring.

His professional story is best approached through those decisions. What deserves inclusion? Which number deserves confidence? How much explanation belongs beside a headline? He returns to questions that become more pressing as the volume of information rises. A longer report can look industrious while leaving its recipient with a longer job.

A company built after the research desk

Vincent came to DigiMent with experience at Nasdaq’s Media Intelligence operation, Thomson Reuters’ Media Research & Insights, and Redegg Media Monitoring Solutions, also known as MyMediaInfo. His work included bringing client projects aboard and managing research teams. These were roles close to the practical machinery of an information service: customers with requirements, analysts with assignments, and coverage that needed interpretation.

The founding choice followed that background. DigiMent would use automation and people together. The machine could help gather material; trained analysts would contribute selection and understanding. Vincent’s stated ambition concerned the quality of what reached the client. In this arrangement, the person reading the news remains part of the production process.

JANUARY2017

Vincent starts DigiMent Research, combining automated monitoring with analyst curation.

That choice has a useful consequence for how his business can be understood. A client is buying work completed on their behalf. The search results are intermediate material. The deliverable is something a communications team can read, circulate, or examine without first repeating all the preparation.

The breakfast test

Vincent’s 2020 writing about executive news briefs places the reader at the beginning of the working day. A brief should gather the coverage that matters to that organization: its brands, products, partners, competitors, and industry. The scope comes from the business. An executive opening the email should encounter an arrangement of relevant developments rather than an unattended search.

“Your requirement determines everything here.”

Biju D. Vincent, on executive news briefs

The sentence is plain enough to slip past. It also asks a service provider to do something demanding: understand the customer before deciding what counts as news. A competitor’s announcement might belong beside a brand mention. An industry development might matter without naming the client at all. Literal matching has only carried the work part of the distance.

DigiMent’s news-digest offering gives those choices a format. It describes custom categories and branding, article dates and headlines, original links, author and publication details, and analyst-scored sentiment. A synopsis can be supplied when needed. For multilingual tracking, analysts review machine-translated summaries. The company offers delivery from as early as 5 a.m. Eastern, making the deadline part of the service.

The format reveals what Vincent’s argument looks like on an ordinary morning. Sorting, checking, summarizing, and presentation all happen before the report is opened. The reader gets an edited object. Even the category headings have a job: they make it possible to move through the material without discovering its organization from scratch.

THE WORK BEFORE THE INBOX
  1. 01FindGather relevant coverage.
  2. 02ReadCheck meaning and context.
  3. 03PrepareOrganize a usable brief.
A schematic of the collection, interpretation, and delivery tasks described in DigiMent’s services. No performance quantities implied.

A number with some explaining to do

Vincent’s interest in interpretation extends to measurement. In his writing on PR metrics, he asks for methods that can be explained and applied consistently. His concern is the distance between a number that pleases a client and a number that helps the client understand coverage. Those two can share a dashboard rather comfortably.

He questions advertising value equivalency, the practice of assigning earned coverage a value by comparison with advertising space. He also challenges vanity metrics that suggest accomplishment without connecting clearly to communications goals. His preferred discussion includes sentiment, the presence of key messages, coverage patterns, and comparison with competitors.

The argument makes him a critic of unexplained arithmetic inside his own field. A multiplier should have a reason to exist. A chart should help answer a question. His published position is a demand for accountability from the people constructing the report, including those selling it.

DigiMent’s media-analysis service reflects that interest through human-coded analysis of themes, messages, sentiment, and competitive share of voice. It also offers publication, influencer, and audience analysis. These are different ways of examining coverage, each carrying a different question. The useful choice depends on what the customer needs to understand.

There is a tension here worth keeping in view. Human involvement is a method, and its value still depends on the work being done carefully. Vincent’s argument for transparent evaluation gives the customer a sensible place to begin: ask how the result was produced and why the chosen measure belongs in the report.

An invitation to the measurement conversation

In June 2020, Vincent was announced as a guest for the fifteenth edition of #EvaluatePR, organized by Nigeria’s P+ Measurement Services. The scheduled online session paired him with Seye Olurotimi, lead consultant at CedarTribe. Its subject was measurement and evaluation in contemporary public relations.

June 2020 EvaluatePR event artwork announcing Biju D. Vincent and Seye Olurotimi as guests
Two guests, one measuring tape: the announcement artwork for the June 19, 2020 #EvaluatePR session.

The invitation places Vincent’s concerns in a conversation beyond a sales presentation. Measurement professionals and communications practitioners were being brought together to exchange experience and advice. The announcement connects his work at DigiMent to peers discussing how PR should assess its contribution.

It also fits the subjects of his public writing. The brief asks what deserves attention now. Measurement asks what the accumulated coverage means. Both require someone to make a defensible choice about the evidence in front of them.

How much interruption is useful?

A scheduled briefing solves one kind of reading problem. A developing story creates another. DigiMent’s human-curated alert service lets customers choose frequency, topics, regions, and the amount of text they receive. Analysts select relevant developments and prepare notifications. The company describes an option for near-real-time alerts alongside daily or weekly delivery.

Here, the editorial decision concerns interruption. What should arrive immediately, and what can wait? A headline and a short summary impose different demands on the reader. So does an alert sent every time a word appears. Vincent’s founding preference for human curation has a concrete application in these choices about timing and relevance.

The broader catalog stretches that preference in other directions. Industry briefs can follow publications, white papers, surveys, commentary, and industry figures. Social Media Highlights concentrates on influential posts and conversations around brands and competitors. The same customer might need a view of the surrounding industry as well as an account of what happened to its own name.

Those services expose the limits of treating monitoring as a single search box. Each product has an audience and a reading occasion. A regional development, a competitive move, and a highly visible social post may deserve different treatment. The work involves deciding where each belongs.

There is an editorial quality to this arrangement, even when the finished product is made for a corporate inbox. Selection determines what gets seen. Categories suggest relationships. A summary can save a reader time, provided it preserves the point of the original. The link remains important because it lets the recipient examine the underlying article. In a useful brief, convenience and the ability to check can sit together.

The reader has a job, too

A February 2022 DigiMent article on monitoring problems groups the difficulties into four practical complaints: time spent, missed mentions, unwanted noise, and budget. Its proposed responses include analyst review, adjusted searches, and packages shaped around customer requirements. The list is recognizably operational. It concerns the daily burden of getting a report made.

That burden helps explain the business Vincent chose to build. A communications professional who spends the morning checking a monitoring tool’s results has become part of the tool’s production staff. The cost includes the work displaced by those checks. A finished service has to justify itself in that everyday setting.

Reading his arguments together, a consistent professional preference emerges: information should come with enough care that the next person can use it. That is an interpretation of his work, rather than a claim about his private temperament. It appears in the emphasis on customer requirements, the insistence that metrics need an intelligible method, and the place reserved for analysts in the company he started. Each puts an obligation on the provider before asking for the reader’s attention.

Vincent’s position leaves room for technology to improve. His measurement writing acknowledges that machine learning can become more accurate. His company was founded on a combination of methods. The continuing question is where interpretation should happen, and who takes responsibility for it before the information reaches its intended reader.

For a founder in media intelligence, the morning brief offers a fairly exacting test. It must arrive when expected, concern the right subjects, and make its contents understandable. There is little room to hide behind an impressive search total once a reader begins opening the links.

Vincent’s career has brought him from established media-research operations to a company built around that test. The ambition takes the form of a familiar object: a report prepared for somebody else. Apple can remain a fruit when it needs to. The executive can get on with the day.

Follow the work