Company profile
●From cloud telephony to conversation intelligence●3,500+ brands, according to Ozonetel●CloudAgent / oneCXi / CXi Switch●From cloud telephony to conversation intelligence●3,500+ brands, according to Ozonetel●CloudAgent / oneCXi / CXi Switch

Enterprise software   /   Customer experience

The Call Center That Started Listening

Ozonetel began by moving business calls to the cloud. Its more interesting bet is that the conversations themselves can tell a company what to fix next.

A phone call is an oddly perishable thing. A customer explains the problem, an agent solves some of it, a supervisor sees a queue move, and then the next call arrives. The business may keep a recording, but recording is not the same as remembering. Ozonetel has spent nearly two decades building software around that gap. First it helped companies make and route calls without their own roomful of telephone hardware. Now it wants those conversations to inform the next decision.

  • Ozonetel sells cloud contact-center software and the broader oneCXi customer-experience platform.
  • Its tools span calls, WhatsApp and other digital channels, AI-assisted service, quality checks, and conversation analysis.
  • It says more than 3,500 brands use its platform across 150 countries.
  • The practical test: faster contact, better routing, and fewer customers forced to repeat themselves.

This sounds like a natural progression, though the road was not paved with glamour. Ozonetel was founded in 2007 by Murthy Chintalapati, Atul Sharma, and Chaitanya Chokkareddy. Its early work included KooKoo, a cloud telephony platform for developers, and CloudAgent, the contact-center system that remains central to the business. Dialers, call distribution, IVR menus, recordings, and agent dashboards are the plumbing of customer service. Nobody writes poetry about automatic call distribution. Yet if the plumbing fails, the customer hears hold music.

Ozonetel founders Chaitanya Chokkareddy, Murthy Chintalapati, and Atul Sharma in a 2021 photograph
Three people, one persistent problem. Chaitanya Chokkareddy, Murthy Chintalapati, and Atul Sharma at the time of Ozonetel’s 2021 funding announcement.

The dial tone was only the beginning

CloudAgent lets teams take inbound calls, run outbound campaigns, route customers by skill or history, and work across voice, SMS, WhatsApp, and other channels from a shared interface. CRM integrations put prior interactions within an agent’s reach. Supervisors can monitor queues and quality. A smaller business can use a lighter phone-system version; an enterprise can configure more elaborate workflows. The attraction is straightforward: fewer disconnected screens and fewer manual steps between a customer’s question and the person who can answer it.

Ozonetel did not invent the cloud contact center. It competes in a crowded market with Genesys Cloud, Five9, Talkdesk, and regional telephony providers. Its distinguishing claim is the combination of operating infrastructure with a layer that interprets conversations. The newer oneCXi umbrella adds CXi Pulse for topics and sentiment, CXi Audit for configurable quality reviews, agent assistance, and CXi Switch, which embeds a voice conversation in an app or website. The pieces are related by a simple question: what can the company do with a conversation once the call is over?

The order matters. A sentiment chart is decoration if nobody changes the product, script, or routing rule. The better cases start with an inconvenient detail that was already costing someone time or money.

A missed lead has a half-life

Consider ClearTax. In Ozonetel’s account, a new lead could wait nearly 24 hours for first contact. Manual call-detail records and weak dialing made agents spend time on process rather than people. CloudAgent’s progressive dialing and automated workflows reduced that interval to roughly ten to fifteen minutes. The lesson is not that every lead needs a robot. It is that a person ready to talk now may be far less interested tomorrow. Better timing can be a competitive advantage before any predictive model enters the room.

Redcliffe Labs, a diagnostics business, had another sort of delay: patients with varied needs, languages, and reasons for calling. Its Ozonetel deployment used an adaptive IVR that changed menus and routing with caller context. Leads went to advisors by diagnostic requirement and preferred language; CRM details followed the call. According to Ozonetel’s case study, 70% of queries were resolved through self-service IVR, and sales rose 40% over the reported period. Those are customer-reported outcomes from a vendor case study, not a promise that every deployment will perform the same way.

70%queries handled by self-service IVR
40%reported sales increase
60%reported NPS improvement

Figures are reported in Ozonetel’s Redcliffe Labs customer case.

“We can connect adaptively to customers.”Abhishek Kumar, VP of Technology Operations, Redcliffe Labs

There is an unfashionable insight here. The first failure is often not the agent. It is the handoff: the lead that arrives too late, the patient whose language is unknown, the history trapped in a different system. In Tata 1mg’s case, Ozonetel says analysis of conversations revealed pricing dissatisfaction, stockouts, and delivery delays behind many lost purchases. That is a different job from answering calls. It asks the contact center to report back to the rest of the business.

A platform for people who have to answer

Ozonetel’s customers range across finance, health care, retail, logistics, education, and digital commerce. Its public customer list includes BigBasket, Zomato, Tata 1mg, HDFC Bank, WeWork India, and Dyson. These organizations have little in common at the storefront. They do share a familiar operational headache: thousands of conversations happening in parallel, across channels, with customers who assume the company remembers them.

The model is business-to-business software sold through subscriptions and enterprise contracts. CloudAgent offers a 21-day trial. The company asks buyers to request quotes for its Asia plans; a public G2 listing gives an indicative range of $25 to $55 per agent per month for North America and Europe. That is a useful starting point, not a total cost. Calling volumes, integrations, support, compliance needs, and the number of agents all shape a real purchase. The customer also has to budget for the unromantic work of cleaning data and redesigning a workflow.

Ozonetel marketing image showing an agent alongside voice and messaging interactions
One customer, several doorbells. Ozonetel’s CloudAgent illustration puts calls and messages around the same agent - the tidy version of a usually messy day.

Ozonetel’s own expansion follows the same practical logic. It stayed bootstrapped for years, then raised a $5 million Series A from Stakeboat Capital in 2021 to expand in the United States and other markets. In 2024 it acquired CloudConnect Communications, adding mobile-first unified communications and a licensed virtual-network-operator business to the mix. Later that year it introduced CXi Switch, allowing a visitor to start a voice conversation from a digital touchpoint. In 2025 it announced CXi Agents for autonomous workflows and added more features to the platform. The company is following the customer from phone number to browser to app, then back to the service record.

What a caller can teach a company

A useful first move for another company is smaller than buying a grand platform. Pick one high-volume journey. Measure how long it takes to reach a new lead, how often callers repeat information, and which questions drive transfers. Connect the call record to the CRM. Change one routing rule or self-service step, then compare the result. Only after that should the team ask whether AI can review more conversations than a human quality team can sample.

This approach depends on enough interaction volume to see patterns, reliable consent and data practices, and managers willing to act on what the conversations reveal. A business with a handful of simple calls may have little reason to buy a broad suite. Nor does a perfect transcript repair a broken return policy. Software can surface the complaint; someone still has to decide to change the policy.

That is why Ozonetel’s evolution is more interesting than its feature list. A call center used to be where a company answered the phone. Ozonetel is trying to make it the place where the company learns whether its promises survived contact with a customer. The line may be digital now. The test remains human: did the next conversation go better?