In a political campaign, there is no comfortable distance between an idea and its consequences. A line goes into an ad on Tuesday. By Wednesday, someone has measured who watched, who clicked, who recoiled and who went looking for a polling place. The campaign changes. The budget moves. Everyone drinks more coffee. Bully Pulpit International was built by people who learned communications in precisely this laboratory - Barack Obama's 2008 presidential campaign - and then noticed that the rest of institutional life was beginning to look rather similar.
Companies now face constituencies, not merely customers. Sports leagues answer to players, fans, lawmakers, sponsors and sovereign wealth funds at once. A vaccine campaign competes with a cousin's Facebook post. A chief executive's speech becomes social content before the applause has ended. The permanent campaign escaped politics. BPI followed it into the board room.
01 / The operating ideaThe product is a loop, not a press release
Andrew Bleeker and Ben Coffey Clark founded Bully Pulpit Interactive in Washington in 2009. The original name was accurate: this was a digital firm shaped by campaign work. The newer name - Bully Pulpit International - is more revealing. It borrows Theodore Roosevelt's phrase for a position from which one can advocate effectively, then turns the pulpit into a service business.
The company sells strategic planning, audience research, message development, creative production, executive communications, paid media, stakeholder engagement and measurement. This sounds like a long agency menu until you see the organizing principle. Each discipline feeds the next, and the last one is supposed to revise the first. BPI calls itself an “outcomes agency.” The useful translation is: do not wait for the post-campaign slide deck to discover that the campaign was wrong.
The campaign feedback loop
The contrast is not simply with advertising agencies. Edelman, Burson, Weber Shandwick, APCO, Brunswick, FGS Global and a host of political specialists all compete for pieces of this work. The sharper distinction is with the institutional habit of splitting a live problem among a pollster, a creative shop, a media buyer, a public-affairs adviser and an internal analytics team. Every handoff costs time. Worse, each firm can declare its own portion successful while the actual outcome remains stubbornly unchanged.
“You don't have to choose between strategy or tactics.”BPI's operating promise
02 / Proof under pressureGeorgia, five weeks, and a moving target
The cleanest demonstration came during Georgia's 2021 Senate runoffs. BPI worked with the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and the campaigns of Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff to mobilize Democratic voters. The ordinary version of the assignment would have repeated dates and voting instructions at people already inclined to agree. BPI instead ran motivational ads, measured their effect and found the strongest impact among Black voters in rural and suburban precincts.
That discovery mattered because it arrived while there was still money left to spend. The team directed more advertising toward the cohort that the evidence showed was moving. Over five weeks, the program reached 1.5 million voters across nine high-impact platforms and generated more than 200,000 polling-place lookups. BPI's early-vote analysis found both ads increased absentee-ballot requests by 1.3 percent; one increased early participation by 0.2 percent. In a pair of very close elections, small numbers had unusually long shadows.
The technique travels. For the Ad Council, BPI researched the false narratives feeding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and tested counter-narratives. The agency says the resulting messages made research participants as much as 53 percent more likely to take the vaccine. For Walmart, a relationship BPI says has lasted more than a decade, the work connected corporate-affairs content with double-digit favorability gains and millions in online and in-store sales. For Indra Nooyi, BPI reports growing a nearly dormant social presence into an audience of more than one million on LinkedIn while supporting the launch of her memoir.
03 / The acquisition yearsPrivate equity bought a larger map
In April 2023, Broad Sky Partners became BPI's lead investor. The price and ownership terms were not disclosed. Nor were the prices of the acquisitions that followed. What changed is visible anyway: geography became part of the product.
BOLDT arrived in December 2023 with more than 50 professionals across European capitals, prompting the rebrand from Interactive to International. Seven Hills and Message House added UK campaigning, events and message research in 2024. Propper Daley brought culture-first strategy, entertainment philanthropy and creator relationships in March 2025. Agado Communications brought specialized sports counsel two months later. In May 2026, Germany's 365 Sherpas joined the group.
The acquisitions also reveal what BPI thinks failed first in the old model: one-way communications. Buying reach is no longer enough when audiences inhabit different media worlds and borrow trust from creators, athletes, colleagues and online communities. The firm's newer phrase, “cultural lobbying,” argues that policy is often preceded by a slower contest over what feels normal, urgent or permissible. Propper Daley supplies the cultural messengers; Agado supplies sports fluency; the European firms supply local political context. BPI supplies the campaign chassis beneath them.
04 / The usable lessonCopy the feedback loop, not the swagger
A smaller organization cannot reproduce a network of hundreds of specialists across multiple countries. It can borrow the sequence. Start with one observable behavior, not a foggy ambition to “raise awareness.” Define the narrow audience capable of producing it. Test several messages before committing the budget. Put creative work where that audience actually spends time. Measure soon enough to change course. Then move the next dollar toward evidence rather than hierarchy.
The five moves worth stealing
- Name the behavior you want, not merely the sentiment you admire.
- Find the persuadable audience; “everyone” is not a segment.
- Test competing frames before polishing one into oblivion.
- Keep researchers, makers and media buyers in the same conversation.
- Reserve time and budget to act on what measurement discovers.
There are conditions under which the method becomes theater. It struggles when the desired outcome cannot be observed, when the audience is too tiny for meaningful testing, when privacy or regulation properly limits targeting, or when leadership has already fallen in love with a message and only wants analytics to applaud. It also cannot manufacture credibility that the client has not earned. Measurement can tell you that people do not believe you. It cannot, by itself, make them wrong.
That restraint matters because BPI works in the business of influence, a trade that deserves scrutiny precisely when it is effective. Its clients range from candidates and causes to Walmart, McDonald's, Goldman Sachs and the PGA TOUR. The agency's advantage is an ability to see the same structural problem beneath wildly different briefs: attention is scattered, trust is borrowed, and a message is only as useful as the action it produces.
The bully pulpit was once a place - a presidency, a lectern, a commanding institution. BPI's business is built on the less comfortable idea that the place has dissolved. The pulpit is now a temporary arrangement of audience, messenger, medium and moment. You do not own it. You assemble it, test it, and watch closely enough to know when it has moved.