LATEST / 01
●TTI CASE STUDY: MODERNIZATION MILESTONES THROUGH SEPTEMBER 2026●SONATAFY: NO. 3,912 ON THE 2025 INC. 5000
Company / Software deliveryThe ownership issue

Sonatafy puts a name on the deadline.

Software teams can grow while delivery slows. Sonatafy Technology sells a different arrangement: senior engineers, shared working hours, and someone responsible for getting the work into production.

Advertisement

Fifteen minutes is an awkward amount of time. Too long to keep staring at a screen. Too short to begin something substantial. At a small enterprise software startup described in Sonatafy Technology’s case studies, a backend deployment could take approximately 15 to 30 minutes. Routine testing depended heavily on those cloud deployments. Two developers were trying to move a product toward an enterprise pilot, with a waiting room built into their working day.

The useful bits
  • Sonatafy combines senior US leadership with engineering teams across Latin America.
  • Clients can buy fractional leadership, individual engineers, or a team responsible for delivery.
  • The lesson to borrow: examine the waiting before expanding the workforce.

The expensive part was waiting

The startup engaged Sonatafy for fractional CTO guidance. The recommendation was deliberately incremental: introduce a parallel, containerized environment so developers could work locally. Preserve useful existing work. Clarify the minimum viable product. Break the work into smaller stories. The client’s own developers implemented the changes with Sonatafy’s guidance.

Sonatafy reports a working demonstration five weeks after the environment reset. That sequence matters. The intervention began with the conditions under which people worked. A founder preparing a demonstration needed a shorter route from changing software to seeing whether it worked. Hiring another person would have left that route intact.

A name beside the release date

This is the problem Sonatafy wants to own in the crowded software services market. Nearshore development offers familiar commercial attractions: access to engineering talent in nearby time zones and collaboration during US business hours. Sonatafy adds technical leadership and a defined owner for delivery. Its proposition asks buyers to think about the organization surrounding the code.

Its managed delivery POD brings together senior US engineering or CTO leadership, a product manager, an AI architect, quality assurance, and engineers from the United States and Latin America. The unit takes responsibility for an agreed backlog. Custom applications, cloud modernization, analytics platforms, process automation, and AI features can all sit inside that arrangement. Team size follows the work.

The smaller purchase is advisory: a fractional CTO, product leadership, technical project management, or AI consulting. A company with sound leadership and a straightforward capacity gap can instead add individual engineers. That distinction gives buyers a useful question. Do they need more hands, a clearer decision, or somebody responsible for carrying the decision through?

“We assess the system, not your people.”Sonatafy’s advisory services

The company’s background helps explain its combination of staffing and operating advice. Steve Taplin and David Turner co-founded Sonatafy in 2020. Sonatafy describes its acquired engineering organization as dating to 2005. Today, Taplin also hosts Software Leaders Uncensored, interviewing technology leaders about the work of running software organizations.

Sonatafy co-founder and CEO Steve Taplin
Steve Taplin. The pitch starts with people; the promise ends with shipped software.
Sonatafy CTO Chris Horvat
CTO Chris Horvat. Architecture still needs someone willing to make the call.

The customer’s workflow is the test

Consider TTI Success Insights, which delivers behavioral assessments through an international partner network. Its modernization challenge included preserving activities partners relied on while developing a newer platform. Sonatafy combined consulting, fractional technology and product leadership, and managed engineering. The scope included assessment workflows, permissions, account management, and billing integrations.

The telling decision was how to count progress. The teams emphasized workflow parity: could partners complete the business activities they needed? Partner validation became part of readiness. Sonatafy also found that stories requiring additional rounds of requirements clarification tended to take longer. Better decisions before development became part of improving development itself.

97%

Identified platform parity items completed

4.3 days

Median engineering issue cycle time

TTI engagement milestones reported by Sonatafy through September 2026.

Sonatafy reports that the engagement also established dedicated QA practices and seven automated performance indicators. A ten-day AI hackathon produced a copilot prototype; subsequent engineering and readiness work took the capability into a controlled production environment. Those are distinct stages. A demonstration gives people something to evaluate. Operating software needs the surrounding controls.

The bill buys responsibility

Sonatafy is a services business. Its 2022 fundraising materials described possible upfront fees of $2,000 to $40,000 or more for diligence and team setup, followed by fixed monthly charges per dedicated resource. Those historical figures explain the mechanics. Current advisory fees are set during scoping. The buyer needs a proposal that defines responsibilities as carefully as staffing.

The financial history gives the business some scale. Unaudited statements filed with the SEC reported revenue of $3.64 million in 2021 and $8.15 million in 2022, with approximately $750,000 in 2022 net income. Inc. subsequently ranked Sonatafy No. 1,273 in 2024 and No. 3,912 in 2025. Recognition describes the company’s growth; a prospective customer still needs evidence relevant to their own codebase.

Its customers include software businesses, healthcare technology firms, fintech companies, manufacturers, and private equity-backed organizations. The competitive choice is often between building internal capability, engaging a consultant, and contracting engineering capacity. Sonatafy attempts to connect those purchases. Its Nexxus scoreboard puts business outcomes and delivery measures into one view, alongside monthly reviews and quarterly business reviews.

Illustrative Nexxus dashboard showing predictability, time to value, quality, and delivery maturity
The scoreboard gets a seat at the meeting. Sonatafy’s Nexxus illustration contains sample data, not measured customer results. Tap to inspect.

What you can borrow on Monday

Start with the path a change takes through your organization. Record the waits. Make requirements ready before work starts. Name the person who can resolve competing priorities. Test completion against something a customer can actually do. These practices are available to a team that never signs a Sonatafy contract.

Buying the team requires participation. Sonatafy’s onboarding plan depends on an accessible codebase and environments, a documented backlog, and available product leadership, roughly two to four hours a week for alignment. It targets a first delivery sprint in weeks three to six. A locked repository or unavailable decision-maker leaves the engineers waiting again. The useful question returns: what, exactly, is keeping the next piece of software from reaching someone?