THE LATESTSEPT 21, 2026 · SRIVASTAVA’S TRIPLEPOINT DEPARTURE SET FOR DECEMBER 31●VENTURE LENDING · A PARTNERSHIP ACROSS DECADES

People / Venture finance

Sajal Srivastava and the business of buying time

For more than two decades, Sajal Srivastava has worked at the junction of startup ambition and repayment schedules. As the TriplePoint Capital co-founder prepares to leave at the end of 2026, his career offers a close look at the machinery behind venture lending.

An anniversary slipped into the numbers. In July 2019, during a quarterly earnings call, Jim Labe paused to acknowledge twenty years of working with Sajal Srivastava. Srivastava answered with a greeting, then resumed the business of commitments, portfolio companies, and loan repayments. The celebration occupied roughly the space of a handshake. There was, after all, a quarter to explain.

It is a revealing introduction to Srivastava. His public career has unfolded where the language of Silicon Valley meets the obligations of a lender. Startups describe what they hope to become. Credit agreements describe what happens on particular dates. He has spent much of his working life helping bring those two accounts of the future into the same room.

As co-founder and co-chief executive officer of TriplePoint Capital, he has overseen both investment work and the operations that continue after money changes hands. The responsibilities include analysis, account servicing, portfolio monitoring, and documentation. These are useful nouns to keep in view. They make a financing business sound less like an announcement and more like an institution.

“Happy anniversary and good afternoon everyone.”

Sajal Srivastava, July 2019

The education of a lender

Srivastava’s route into that work ran through Stanford University, where he earned an economics bachelor’s degree and a master’s in Engineering Economic Systems & Operations Research. The second title is quite a mouthful. It puts economics beside the disciplines of modeling decisions and allocating resources. In a career concerned with capital, timing, and uncertainty, those subjects make useful neighbors.

His early professional work was in the Technology Investment Banking Group at Prudential Securities. He worked on debt and equity financing and mergers-and-acquisitions advisory assignments. He also participated in the team that structured Prudential’s partnership with a venture-focused commercial bank. Even at this stage, the work crossed the boundary between technology companies and the institutions supplying their capital.

At Comdisco Ventures, he worked with Labe and headed the investment and credit analyst team. The responsibilities covered structuring, negotiating, managing transactions, and diligence. Each verb describes a different encounter with risk. Analysis asks whether a transaction should happen. Negotiation settles its terms. Management follows the transaction into a future that may disagree with the original plan.

That combination matters to the shape of his later career. A lending platform needs people who understand the investment decision and the work required to maintain it. The photographable moment is the agreement. The ongoing work involves watching the borrower, administering the arrangement, and keeping the financing connected to changing circumstances. Srivastava’s professional biography reaches across that entire sequence.

The work follows the money
  1. AnalyzeUnderstand the company and financing need.
  2. StructureNegotiate terms and document the agreement.
  3. MonitorFollow performance and service the account.
A signature gets one day. A lending relationship gets the calendar. A conceptual view of the responsibilities in Srivastava’s career.

A partnership with a memory

Labe and Srivastava launched TriplePoint Capital in 2006. Their working relationship had begun earlier at Comdisco. By the time of the anniversary exchange in 2019, the partnership had crossed institutions and lasted twenty years. That continuity is a substantial part of the story: the venture business changes its favorite technologies considerably faster than that.

The firm’s approach also makes relationships part of the investment process. Labe has described reputation, references, and relationships as the first three of four Rs, with returns following from doing those well. The idea gives the familiar language of networking a practical purpose. Who backs a company, what others say about it, and how a financier behaves can all matter when a borrower needs another decision.

There is a personal dimension in the public anniversary, without needing to invent a private scene. Two colleagues took a moment inside a routine corporate ritual to acknowledge their shared history. Then they returned to work. The sequence is revealing on its own: a long relationship, a brief pleasantry, a room full of people waiting for the financial details.

A company grows; a calendar keeps moving

Srivastava has offered a plain explanation of one reason venture debt can appeal to a growing company. On a 2019 earnings call, he connected active exit markets with the desire of other companies to accelerate. Growing faster can mean spending more. Spending more creates a need for additional capital. Borrowing offers a financing route that does not require setting the company’s valuation for a fresh equity round.

The distinction helps explain his place in the startup ecosystem. An equity investor buys an ownership position. A lender provides capital under repayment terms. A company may use both. The choice involves how much money it needs, what it expects to accomplish, and what obligations it can take on. The growth plan has to survive contact with the financing schedule.

Debt also deserves its full name. It has to be repaid, and it can carry interest, fees, and other conditions. At TriplePoint Venture Growth, financing can include warrants and direct equity investments as well. A warrant gives its holder a right to acquire shares under specified terms. The resulting arrangement can combine contractual lending income with participation in a company’s equity value.

For the reader, the useful question is what each piece is doing. Capital can fund activity now. A repayment schedule establishes future demands. An equity component creates another potential source of return. Putting the parts together requires judgment about a company’s prospects and the terms of the investment. Enthusiasm alone has a regrettably poor reputation as a payment method.

Three parts of a financing relationship
CompanyCapital for its plans
LenderRepayment, interest, agreed fees
Equity componentPotential participation through warrants or shares
Different claims on the same business. Conceptual illustration, not the terms of a particular loan.

The lender borrows, too

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp., or TPVG, brought this work into a public investment vehicle. Its initial public offering took place in March 2014. Srivastava served as president and chief investment officer. At the start of operations, TPVG acquired an initial investment portfolio from TriplePoint Capital and affiliates. The lending platform now had a public shareholder audience alongside the companies receiving financing.

That adds another calendar. A lender needs capital available when borrowers draw on commitments. It also has to manage its own funding, investment income, and obligations. A company receiving a loan may be thinking about the next product milestone. The financing institution has to think about that milestone and its own balance sheet. Both parties have plans; neither has exclusive use of the future.

Srivastava’s public discussions repeatedly return to this balancing act. In 2019, he spoke about maintaining sufficient funding capacity while being careful about taking on higher-cost, long-term capital. It is a practical concern: the ability to make investments depends partly on the terms under which the investor itself obtains money. The lender’s financing decisions sit behind the borrower’s financing decision.

There are exceptions to ordinary business, too. Asked about a short Casper loan connected with a take-private transaction, Srivastava described it as an unusual opportunity supporting an existing portfolio company with a visible transaction ahead. He distinguished the arrangement from the platform’s routine work. The explanation matters because an unusual deal can be mistaken for a change of occupation.

When the next round takes longer

The relationship between venture equity and venture debt becomes particularly clear when conditions grow difficult. In May 2023, Srivastava discussed a challenging equity-investment environment and the way uncertainty had paused or delayed financing activity and strategic events. The point was a connection between markets. A lender’s assessment of a company also involves the environment in which that company may seek additional capital.

It is easy to describe a startup through its destination: a bigger business, an acquisition, a public listing. Lending requires attention to the journey’s intermediate dates. If events take longer, the financing plan may need scrutiny. A good idea does not make the sequence of cash needs disappear. The prospect of eventual success and the ability to meet an obligation remain distinct questions.

Later discussions show the work of changing a portfolio rather than merely waiting for the market to improve. In November 2025, Srivastava talked about selecting opportunities, managing liquidity, and preparing for debt refinancing. He also described adding customers in the sectors the platform was targeting. The portfolio is a collection of decisions made at different moments; its composition can be changed by subsequent decisions.

By the second-quarter 2026 discussion, he was explaining rotation into newer investment vintages and the sale of TPVG’s debt and equity investments in Prodigy Finance. He kept the quarterly new-funding target at $25 million to $50 million. Demand for financing and the amount a particular vehicle intends to fund are separate measures. The gap between them is where allocation, capacity, and selectivity enter the conversation.

TPVG · stated 2026 quarterly new-funding target
$25mto$50m
A target range discussed in Q2 2026, not a promise of results and not the total financing activity of TriplePoint Capital.

The last date on this calendar

On September 21, 2026, TriplePoint announced that Srivastava would leave at the close of business on December 31. Labe would become sole chief executive. Srivastava’s executive roles and board service at TPVG and TriplePoint Private Venture Credit would also end on that date. Ian Schworer, a colleague who joined TriplePoint in 2014, would take on chief investment officer responsibilities.

The announcement creates a definite endpoint for this chapter of the partnership. It also makes the operating institution visible again. Investment committees, credit teams, legal work, and portfolio oversight have to continue through a leadership change. A founder’s contribution includes the structure that can carry those responsibilities forward. The handover puts names and dates to that continuing work.

Srivastava expressed pride in what he and Labe had built and an intention to keep pursuing innovation in the venture capital ecosystem. His next sentence supplies a fitting ending:

“I’m excited to begin a new chapter and continue my passion for driving innovation in the venture capital ecosystem.”

Sajal Srivastava, September 2026

The career behind that sentence has involved an unusual kind of proximity to entrepreneurship. He has helped finance companies while working on the analysis, contracts, and operations that lending requires. The anniversary greeting offered a small human moment inside that machinery. The December deadline offers another. Between them lies the working life of a financier who has had to think carefully about what time costs.

Continue the conversation

Explore TriplePoint Capital, Srivastava’s LinkedIn profile, and TriplePoint on X.