BREAKING THE WORKFLOW KERV DIGITAL: 1,000+ PROJECTS MICROSOFT CLOUD: ALL SIX DESIGNATIONS AXA FIRST APP ITERATION: SIX MONTHS

Company profile / Enterprise technology

The Microsoft Fixers Who Start With the Mess, Not the Software

Kerv Digital sells Microsoft transformation without pretending the software is the difficult bit. Its better trick is finding the human bottleneck first - then making Dynamics, Azure, Power Platform and AI behave like one system.

Advertisement
By YesPress Editors5 September 20269 min read

The first thing to understand about Kerv Digital is that it rarely arrives because somebody wants a shinier login screen. It arrives when the useful information is trapped in the wrong database, a mobile build is crawling, reports have become a weekly act of archaeology or a customer-service agent must hop between systems while a caller waits. The Birmingham-rooted consultancy then reaches for familiar Microsoft machinery - Dynamics 365, Azure, Power Platform, Power BI and, increasingly, AI - but the machinery is not the plot. The plot is the jammed process.

That distinction matters in a market crowded with firms able to sell licences and staff an implementation. Kerv Digital's strongest public work is specific about what failed first. AXA Health's delivery pipeline was slow. Practice Plus Group's marketing tool could not segment audiences or automate journeys properly. ThirdWay had Power BI, yet senior leaders still lacked a usable view across the business. Children 1st had an end-of-life database whose language reduced families to transactional “service users.” These were technical problems with human consequences - delayed releases, repetitive labour, hazy decisions and records that no longer matched the charity's values.

6 mo.AXA Health's first app iteration
80%Reduction in initial build time at AXA
1,000+Digital and software projects delivered

A company assembled around the missing pieces

Kerv Digital is easier to grasp as an assembly than as a pristine startup. The legal entity began in 2011 as cloudThing, a software and digital-transformation business that joined Kerv in 2021 and became the group's digital practice. WORTH joined in 2023, adding product strategy, user experience, mobile engineering and teams in Britain and South Africa. Then Inciper arrived in 2024 with 75 practitioners and deep Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations, data and analytics expertise. Its acquisition price was not disclosed.

The resulting practice can plausibly remain in the room from discovery to deployment: business analysts and designers at one end; Dynamics consultants, data scientists and more than 200 developers in the middle; quality assurance and DevSecOps at the other. In 2024 chief executive Stuart Harper said Kerv Digital had grown beyond 400 people and £50 million in annual turnover. The wider Kerv group, now backed by Bridgepoint Development Capital with LDC reinvesting £30 million, supplies adjacent cloud, networking, security, compliance and contact-centre capability.

Kerv colleagues working together around a laptop in the Birmingham office
Three people, one laptop, zero ceremonial robots. Kerv's Birmingham office makes a decent picture of its actual product: shared attention.

This breadth is Kerv Digital's market position. A client could hire a global systems integrator, a boutique Dynamics partner, a design studio and a managed-service provider separately. Kerv offers a Microsoft specialist large enough to combine those jobs, yet presents itself as close enough to the work to challenge a clumsy process. That promise is not automatically cheaper; public rate cards are absent. The economic case rests on shorter delivery, less rework, higher adoption and continuing support rather than bargain implementation.

“We've learnt a lot about designing a product with a customer, rather than for a customer.”Calvin Mills, Tech Lead, AXA Health

The vertical slice that changed the conversation

AXA Health supplies the cleanest view of the method. The insurer wanted a wellbeing app offering expert programmes, assessments and self-care tools. Kerv's WORTH team did not begin by building every feature. It mapped dependencies, aligned leadership and ran agile bootcamps. Then it built a “vertical slice” through one simple user journey. That narrow working path forced infrastructure, security and compliance constraints into view while they were still cheap enough to address.

iOS and Android versions advanced in parallel through short iterations. Real-time behaviour analytics provided early feedback. Code-analysis tools, threat-modelling workshops and team guilds moved quality and security into the delivery routine. The first app iteration appeared within six months, the downloadable product within twelve, and CI/CD improvements cut build time by 80 percent from its initial performance. More important for anyone hoping to copy the move, Kerv built reusable cloud patterns and taught the client's team the new process. The deliverable was an app and a less dependent organisation.

The copyable sequence

01Name the blocked outcome
02Audit the real system
03Build one thin slice
04Measure behaviour
05Teach the team to run it

The same willingness to change course appears at ThirdWay. The office-design company already owned Power BI, but its implementation was not fit for purpose and employees still assembled reports manually. After an audit, the Inciper team did not keep patching. It started again with Azure and Power BI, delivered managing-director analytics across four entities in three weeks, then added departmental reporting. The full turnaround took three sprints and six weeks. The audit changed their mind because it revealed that preserving the old implementation would protect the wrong investment.

Microsoft is the platform; restraint is the product

Kerv now holds all six Microsoft Solutions Partner designations, covering Business Applications, Data & AI, Digital & App Innovation, Infrastructure, Modern Work and Security. Accreditations help it enter large, regulated programmes. The more revealing line in its Microsoft guidance, however, is modest: configure before customising. Dynamics and Power Platform already contain many of the pieces clients request. Using those pieces first limits bespoke code, protects compatibility with future releases and keeps licence spend closer to actual need.

That restraint also marks the conditions under which the playbook fits. It is strongest where an organisation has complicated workflows, fragmented data, governance obligations and a willingness to standardise around Microsoft's cloud. It is weaker if a client wants a tiny standalone product, rejects the Microsoft ecosystem, cannot free frontline staff for research or insists on reproducing every eccentricity of a legacy system. “Human-centred” delivery needs humans in the room. Without decision-makers, users and owners willing to alter the process, workshops become expensive stationery.

From a pitch deck to a working record

The Unilever International project shows where Kerv thinks enterprise AI belongs. New-product development sprawled across marketing, finance, supply chain and research, with decisions disappearing into email chains and PowerPoint decks. Working with Setel and Microsoft, Kerv helped build a shared platform around Outlook, Teams and Copilot Studio. AI extracted relevant material from uploaded decks and created structured project records. The reported result was up to 80 percent fewer manual touchpoints and a 20 to 30 percent improvement in time-to-market, across a programme associated with more than 1,000 innovations in 200 markets.

There is no theatrical chatbot at the centre of that story. A document enters; usable fields come out; colleagues stop re-keying them. Kerv's latest account of generative AI in a national charity helpline makes the same point more directly: summarising a conversation is easy compared with understanding what happened before, what is happening now and what should happen next. That demands connected context from Genesys Cloud, Dynamics 365, Power Platform and Azure. The glamorous model is only as useful as the plumbing around it.

The practical lesson: look for a small task repeated at brutal volume. Kerv estimates that saving ten minutes on an activity performed 160,000 times would release more than 26,000 hours. The arithmetic is hypothetical; the selection rule is excellent.

The customer is buying fewer awkward Tuesdays

Kerv Digital makes money through consultancy, implementations and custom product delivery, followed by support, QA, DevSecOps and managed services. Its customers range from government agencies and charities to healthcare, manufacturers and consumer brands: the Maritime and Coastguard Agency, Office for National Statistics, Children 1st, Practice Plus Group, AXA Health, Costa Express, Goodfellow and Unilever International all appear in public work.

Their common purchase is not “transformation” in the abstract. Practice Plus Group wanted automated, segmented patient communications and migrated in eight weeks with zero reported data loss. Goodfellow wanted an ERP that could support global operations and connect to Salesforce and Adobe Commerce; its Dynamics 365 implementation took about 16 months. Children 1st wanted records that respected how social workers speak about families. Each bought fewer awkward Tuesdays - fewer spreadsheets, fewer duplicate entries, fewer releases that take all afternoon, fewer moments when the system makes a person sound like a parcel.

The business model also explains why Kerv talks so much about continuous improvement. A fixed implementation can end at go-live; QA, DevSecOps and managed support turn the relationship into recurring work. Clients gain one accountable supplier, while Kerv gains a longer view of the system it built. That arrangement works when the support team keeps challenging needless complexity. It becomes less attractive when “one partner” turns into lock-in or when a client lacks the internal owner needed to question priorities. The healthiest version is visible in Goodfellow's aim for Dynamics self-sufficiency and AXA's embedded guilds: the consultant stays useful without making itself indispensable.

The company line is “digital transformation with the human touch.” Consultancy websites are well supplied with such phrases. Kerv Digital becomes interesting when the phrase turns into a design constraint: measure user adoption, change the vocabulary, place insight inside the existing workflow and leave reusable patterns behind. Its acquisitions have made the practice broader; its Microsoft badges make it safer to shortlist. The harder advantage to preserve is the habit of asking what is actually stuck before opening the toolbox.