The Optimist
Who Bet on Tomorrow
He was on Jeopardy! in 2002, winning as a business journalist who knew the answer. He holds a named endowed fellowship at one of Washington's most prominent think tanks. He publishes a newsletter four or five days a week, records a podcast that has run for over 200 episodes, and wrote a book arguing that the greatest threat to American civilization is that we stopped dreaming. None of this is why James Pethokoukis is interesting. What's interesting is that he means it.
Washington produces a lot of people who argue in favor of growth, innovation, and progress. Most of them are promoting something - a client, a party, a lobbying position dressed in the language of the future. Pethokoukis's peculiarity is that his techno-optimism is genuine in the way that makes people uncomfortable. He started writing "The Conservative Futurist" without hope, he admits, and finished it with some. That is not the trajectory of a professional persuader. That is someone actually working something out.
Not taking any risks might be the biggest risk of all.
- James PethokoukisThe Year Everything Broke
The central claim of Pethokoukis's intellectual project is audacious enough to be worth stating plainly: America's technological progress stalled in 1973, and it was not primarily an economic problem or a political problem - it was a cultural one. The year that "Soylent Green" came out in theaters, oil shocks hit, and the Vietnam War eroded institutional trust was also the year the culture switched from imagining the future with excitement to imagining it with dread. The Jetsons gave way to dystopias. Tomorrowland became an anachronism. And for the next fifty years, the "Great Downshift" played out in slow motion.
This is the framework Pethokoukis uses to explain why we were promised flying cars and got 280 characters instead. It's a narrative move that would sound conspiratorial from anyone else, but Pethokoukis grounds it in productivity data, R&D statistics, and the kind of economic history you get when someone has spent decades covering business for U.S. News, Reuters, and AEI. His argument is not that government or markets failed. His argument is that culture stopped wanting progress enough to demand it.
"The purpose of an economy is to turn dreams into reality. We stopped dreaming big - and the economy noticed."
Up-Wing. Not Left, Not Right.
The political taxonomy Pethokoukis has revived - "Up Wing" versus "Down Wing" - originally came from FM-2030, a transhumanist writer from the 1970s. Pethokoukis adapted it for the present moment. Up-Wing people believe in human agency, technological solutions, and the deliberate construction of a better future. Down-Wing people believe that progress creates as many problems as it solves and that caution is wisdom. The frame cuts across traditional left-right lines, which is precisely its value.
He is careful to note that this does not mean ignoring risks or pretending technology is always good. His argument is about the default posture. A culture that treats every new technology as a threat to be managed is not cautious - it is slow. And slow, in 2025, means falling behind in AI, in fusion, in genomics, in every race that will determine what kind of century this turns out to be.
Faster, Please! - The Newsletter That Runs on Robert Lucas
The newsletter is the engine now. Four or five issues a week, a paid tier at eight dollars a month, tens of thousands of subscribers - "Faster, Please!" is the daily expression of everything Pethokoukis thinks about the relationship between technology and human flourishing. Its tagline is almost aggressive in its clarity: Discovering, creating, and inventing a better world through technological innovation, economic growth, and pro-progress culture.
He opens it with an epigraph from Nobel laureate economist Robert Lucas: "Once you start thinking about growth, it's hard to think about anything else." That's not a decorative quote. That's the operating system. Growth, in Pethokoukis's framework, is not GDP for its own sake - it is the mechanism by which problems get solved, poverty declines, diseases get cured, and futures become livable. To be against growth, or even casually indifferent to it, is to be against those downstream goods.
Recent newsletters have covered AI adoption rates (only around 10% of firms using it regularly as of late 2025), U.S. productivity growth running at nearly 2.7% for 2025 - almost double the prior decade's average - and America's "megaproject imperative." The range is characteristic: Pethokoukis follows the data to wherever it leads, whether that is optimistic or uncomfortable.
Faster, Please! - 4-5 issues/week on Substack. Covers AI, nuclear, economic growth, tech policy, and the cultural conditions for progress.
Political Economy with Jim Pethokoukis - 200+ episodes. AEI's flagship economics podcast. 4.7 stars on Apple. Economists, CEOs, historians.
The Conservative Futurist (2023). 336 pages on why 1973 broke America's future and how to reclaim the sci-fi world we were promised.
The AEI Years - When a Journalist Became a Thinker
Pethokoukis started as a journalist. BA in Soviet politics and U.S. history from Northwestern (1989), followed by an MSJ from Medill. He covered business at Investor's Business Daily and USA Today before landing at U.S. News & World Report, where he spent twelve years writing the "Capital Commerce" economics column. In 2009 he moved to Reuters Breakingviews as their Washington columnist. By 2012 he had joined AEI as a Senior Fellow and was awarded the DeWitt Wallace Chair - a named, endowed fellowship that marks you as permanent intellectual furniture, not a visiting practitioner.
The AEI post gave him what journalism rarely does: time. Time to read the economic history that informed "The Conservative Futurist." Time to develop a framework rather than just cover the latest data point. Time to argue that the difference between 2% and 3% annual productivity growth, compounded over decades, is the difference between civilization as we know it and something dramatically more abundant and humane.
His podcast launched in 2012 and has run to over 200 episodes. Guests include economists, military strategists, housing researchers, AI researchers, historians. The range reflects the range of the newsletter: if it touches economic growth, technological progress, or the conditions for a better future, Pethokoukis has an opinion and has found someone worth interrogating about it.
Imagine a 21st century politics that explicitly embraced rapid economic growth and technological progress.
- James PethokoukisThe Book and What It Cost Him
"The Conservative Futurist: How to Create the Sci-Fi World We Were Promised" came out in October 2023 from Center Street (Hachette). Pethokoukis has said he started writing it without hope and finished with some. That admission matters. Books written from certainty are advocacy. Books written through uncertainty are something else.
The argument is structured around what he calls "Up Wing" conservatism - explicitly distinct from the populist nostalgia that dominates much of the American right. Where populist conservatism looks backward toward a better past, Pethokoukis's conservatism looks forward toward a better future while preserving the market mechanisms and individual freedoms that make getting there possible. He is not an ideological libertarian - he argues for increased government R&D spending to Apollo-era levels as a percentage of GDP. He is not a big-government liberal - he argues for deregulation in housing and nuclear. The book inhabits a position that mainstream American politics does not yet have a home for, which is part of why he keeps writing the newsletter instead of joining a campaign.
What He Actually Wants
By 2045, Pethokoukis wants: human-level AI that is operational and broadly beneficial. Fusion reactors producing commercial power. Space habitats hosting human populations. Treatable cancers and Alzheimer's. Sustained 2.5-3% annual economic growth. Dramatic reductions in global poverty. The realization, in short, of the "promised sci-fi future" - not as a fantasy but as the logical outcome of what happens when a society decides to take technological progress seriously instead of managing it defensively.
He is not naive about what stands in the way. He has covered Washington long enough to know that most institutions prefer stability to transformation, that regulatory capture is real, that political economy often defeats good economics. His argument is not that the path is clear but that the destination matters enough to keep walking toward it. That is, in its own way, a form of courage.
The best advice he says he ever received: "What matters is what you do." Coming from a man who publishes four days a week and has done so for years, that's not inspiration-poster language. That's a working principle.
Latest Updates (2025-2026)
U.S. productivity growth hit roughly 2.7% in 2025 - nearly double the prior decade's average - a data point Pethokoukis has flagged as a meaningful early signal of AI's economic effects. His recent podcast episodes have ranged from AI and geopolitics (with Hal Brands) to housing shortage solutions (with Tobias Peter) to military preparedness. The newsletter continues its 4-5x weekly pace, covering AI adoption rates, nuclear energy debates, immigration economics, and what Pethokoukis calls the "megaproject imperative" - America's need to rebuild its capacity to execute large-scale, ambitious infrastructure. In April 2026, he continues as one of the most consistent and prolific voices in the pro-progress intellectual ecosystem.