LATEST / PAYMENTS

Company / Payment infrastructure

DECTA does the work behind the payment button

A bank wants card payments. A fintech wants its own cards. DECTA sells the infrastructure that makes both possible, with the fiddly parts included.

Advertisement

The payment button gets the glory. It is small, reassuring and usually the last thing a shopper sees before the thank-you screen. Behind it sits a less photogenic business: connecting financial institutions, checking transactions, calculating charges and making sure the records agree. DECTA has built its offering around that work, including the awkward details a customer’s existing systems refuse to do.

Consider Industra Bank in Latvia. It wanted to add Mastercard and Visa acquiring, the service that lets businesses accept card payments. DECTA’s assignment included network connections, transaction processing, chargebacks, customized commission calculations and reports for the bank’s finance department and regional supervisor. The reported Mastercard integration took less than four months from the initial introduction. A new payment service had to work in the accounts department as well as at checkout.

That is the useful way into DECTA. It sells the machinery behind financial products, often with another company’s brand on the front. Its appeal lies in how much of the operational job it can take on, and how closely it can fit that job to the customer.

Someone else’s name on the front

DECTA’s UK company was incorporated on December 22, 2015. Today, the business spans merchant acquiring, technical processing, card issuing infrastructure, a white-label payment gateway and digital banking software. Its own count exceeds 2,000 customers and partners. Those customers occupy different positions in the payment chain: a shop taking money, a payment provider serving shops, or a bank offering cards.

The white-label gateway makes this arrangement especially clear. A payment provider can put its own branding on DECTA’s platform and offer merchants a way to manage payments. The product supports different checkout formats and brings online and physical terminal payments into one gateway. The buyer gains a working foundation to configure, while retaining the visible relationship with its customers.

For an ordinary merchant, the proposition is more direct. DECTA’s acquiring service supports card payments and other methods, recurring billing, payment links and one-click purchases. Its published integrations include WooCommerce, Magento, PrestaShop and OpenCart. A travel business collecting a booking and a subscription seller collecting the next month’s payment need different workflows; the underlying platform is meant to accommodate both.

The bank needed the boring bits, too

Industra’s partnership began in late 2020. The details of the implementation explain DECTA’s positioning more convincingly than a promise of easy integration. Reporting had to suit the bank. Commission calculations had to match its banking system. Chargeback processing had to preserve communication with both card networks. These were conditions of a usable service.

The lesson for a prospective buyer is practical: write the reporting and exception-handling requirements into the project at the beginning. A payment demonstration can show an approved transaction in seconds. It takes a more demanding conversation to establish who investigates a disputed payment, which data reaches finance and how a new fee appears in an existing system. Industra’s case makes that conversation look like part of the product.

Industra Bank case-study artwork showing its logo over an industrial interior
Even the plumbing needs plumbing. Industra’s case-study artwork is an apt backdrop for a project spanning card connections, reports and commission calculations. Image: DECTA.

A payroll card is a small operations business

Emerald approached the problem from the other side. The UK electronic money institution wanted to extend its services with branded cards, particularly payroll cards. According to DECTA’s September 2021 case study, Emerald did not have the complete legal and technical capacity to operate the card issuing lifecycle itself.

DECTA supplied Mastercard BIN sponsorship and the associated operations: personalization, delivery, processing, network settlement, notifications, fraud controls and disputes. Emerald’s integration gave cardholders access to functions including ordering cards, changing card status, topping up and checking balances. The resulting offering included physical contactless cards, virtual cards and a payroll program for corporate customers.

The broader card issuing product supports licensed financial institutions through onboarding, design and implementation. A card’s material and artwork are decisions along the way; connecting the customer’s systems and defining fraud rules are others. That sequence is a useful corrective to the idea that launching a financial product means shipping an attractive app.

DECTA’s separate issuer processing service offers APIs for activating and blocking cards, controlling spending limits and viewing balances. It also supplies authentication and tokenization, which replaces sensitive card details with payment tokens for supported uses. These functions help explain the market distinction: a company may need the processing technology, a sponsored card program, or a combination. Buying the wrong layer leaves work unassigned.

What the bill actually contains

DECTA sells through commercial proposals rather than one universal subscription. Its acquirer processing page describes an initial setup charge and recurring monthly maintenance. The setup amount depends on business requirements and technical scope. In other words, a bank’s unusual reporting requirement can be part of the purchasing conversation, alongside the connection itself.

Merchant acquiring has a different charging structure. Customers can choose fixed pricing or IC++, which breaks a transaction’s charges into interchange, scheme-related costs and an acquirer margin. That separation makes the bill easier to interrogate: how much goes to the issuing side, how much relates to the network and processing, and how much is the provider’s markup?

READ THE BILL / IC++
Interchange+Scheme costs+Acquirer margin

Three cost components. This is a pricing structure, not a quoted rate. Setup and maintenance belong to the relevant infrastructure agreement.

In April 2025, DECTA announced a more specific entry offer. Its Fintech Fast Track program would select one issuer and one acquirer each quarter for processing with no setup fee and discounted monthly pricing. Applicants needed a financial license or similar authorization, a ready business plan and relevant card-network ambitions. The discount addressed the cost of getting started for selected businesses; it did not turn the service into open enrollment.

For a buyer comparing proposals, the sensible exercise is to model the whole operating bill at its expected payment volume. Include implementation, recurring charges and the transaction mix, then ask how that calculation changes as the business grows. The cheapest launch can produce a different answer from the cheapest year of operation.

When manual work becomes the constraint

Tempo France’s digital banking project shows why a customer might reconsider its existing setup. In DECTA’s September 2023 account, the money-transfer company faced growing transaction volumes, operational complexity and the challenge of connecting conventional and crypto-related payment flows. Automation was central to the proposed overhaul.

“significantly fewer manual actions and interventions”

Alla Zhedik, Tempo CEO, on the intended workflow

The described solution combined cloud deployment, branded web and mobile interfaces, onboarding and reporting. Tempo’s stated ambition was faster transactions and lower operating costs through fewer interventions. The instructive point is where the company aimed its effort: the work surrounding each payment, as well as the payment itself. For another provider, counting those interventions would be a concrete place to begin.

DECTA’s digital banking platform packages account management, payments, ledger functions and customer interfaces into a broader software offering. It places the company in conversations beyond merchant checkout, including how a financial institution organizes its daily operations. The commercial appeal is consolidation, although a buyer still needs to establish which integrations and responsibilities belong in its own deployment.

The customization bargain

DECTA competes across several markets rather than one tidy category. An acquiring provider is an alternative for a merchant. A technical processor is an alternative for a bank. A gateway vendor may suit a payment service provider. DECTA’s argument is that it can combine these capabilities and adapt them, reducing the number of separate supplier relationships a customer must coordinate.

That breadth makes requirements matter. The company’s technical processing offering requires a licensed financial institution with appropriate card-scheme membership. Its sponsored card program has its own onboarding path. Neither is a casual substitute for a merchant checkout account. A business with a simple acceptance requirement should evaluate that requirement directly, rather than buy complexity because it is available.

Security credentials help establish a starting point for these conversations. DECTA reports PCI DSS Level 1 and ISO certifications, and announced Visa Ready certification for processing and its gateway in June 2022. Its processing pages advertise a 99.99 percent uptime service level. Buyers still need the contractual definition of that figure, the support arrangements and the escalation path for an incident.

The human side is visible in DECTA’s careers material: ten team languages, paid study leave and language classes. Its merchant offering also emphasizes a dedicated account manager. For customers asking for special reports or negotiating an integration, that access is part of the purchase. A flexible platform needs people who can understand the request and carry it through.

Its own money needs better connections

DECTA’s August 2026 OpenPayd announcement offers a neat closing example. The payment infrastructure supplier had integrated another provider’s infrastructure to improve its own international treasury settlement and liquidity management. Even a company that builds payment systems has reasons to buy a specialized service.

The scope is precise. DECTA says the arrangement is exclusively for its proprietary treasury operations and does not support customer-facing cryptocurrency or foreign-exchange services. The announcement discusses fiat infrastructure, conversion and hybrid payment capabilities in that internal context. It is an operational investment, and should be read as one.

For the next bank or fintech considering DECTA, the useful starting document is a map of its own unfinished work. Which network connection is missing? Which report still needs a spreadsheet? Who handles a card after it leaves the envelope? DECTA’s customer projects show a business built around those questions. The payment button can remain small. The job specification should be thorough.

Explore DECTA’s working parts