Work, rewired Byron Auguste • Skills over pedigree • 70+ million STARs • The paper ceiling is a design problem

Profile / Future of Work

Byron Auguste Wants Employers to Stop Hiring the Résumé

The economist behind STARs has spent a decade arguing that talent is abundant, but the signals employers trust are badly designed. His fix begins with a deceptively practical question: can this person do the work?

The job application is a peculiar piece of theater. A company says it wants ingenuity, judgment and grit. Then, before meeting anyone, its software asks where each candidate spent four years in early adulthood. The ritual is so familiar that it passes for common sense. Byron Auguste, an economist who has worked inside boardrooms and the White House, regards it as something less flattering: a market with faulty wiring.

His complaint is not with college. It is with the habit of using a bachelor's degree as a general-purpose gate, including for work where no particular degree is needed. The gate appears efficient. It also hides people who acquired their skills in community college, in the military, through a certificate, during partial college, or by doing the work itself. Opportunity@Work, the nonprofit Auguste co-founded in 2015, gave those people a name: STARs, or workers Skilled Through Alternative Routes.

It is an unusually cheerful acronym for a grim accounting problem. More than 70 million American workers are STARs, roughly half the workforce. When employers treat a degree as proof of skill before they test for skill, an enormous talent pool becomes administratively invisible. A missing piece of paper is allowed to speak louder than years of performance.

“If companies don't have a STARs talent strategy, they only have half a talent strategy.

A ticket punched in COBOL

The idea is personal before it is statistical. Auguste describes Detroit and Phoenix as his childhood hometowns and grew up amid a huge extended family. His father attended college for about a year, then went to work. In Detroit in the early 1970s, he was a shipping clerk in a factory and could not see much road ahead. Then he noticed a newspaper advertisement: learn COBOL and punch your own ticket.

He took the course. A company recognized the skill and gave him a chance. The change redirected the family's economic trajectory. In today's language, Auguste says, his father was a STAR. The story contains the whole argument in miniature: learning happened, someone noticed, and earnings followed. There was no demand that he return to age eighteen and begin again by the approved route.

Auguste's own route had one of its turns hidden in a form. As a high-school student in Phoenix, he saw an unexplained box on the PSAT and filled it in. His score and that checked box led to an invitation to a six-week summer program, where he met students from around the country who were applying to colleges he had barely considered. He applied to Yale. A tiny signal, properly read, widened his map.

He studied economics and political science at Yale, then went to Oxford as a Marshall Scholar, earning an M.Phil. and a doctorate in economics. His research on international payments unions and clearing houses became a book. The subject sounds distant from applicant tracking software, but the instinct is continuous: systems depend on trusted signals, agreed rules and routes through which value can move.

The consultant who noticed the filter

A McKinsey recruiting brochure landed in Auguste's Oxford mailbox when the firm was experimenting with whether people without MBAs could prosper in consulting. He had never heard of McKinsey. The firm, in other words, was testing an alternative-route candidate. He joined in 1993 and stayed for two decades, working across technology, media, education, economic development and innovation.

He became a principal in 1999 and a director, the firm's term for senior partner, in 2005. He was McKinsey's first Black senior partner. Auguste has recalled that he then set a personal goal to help create room for more Black directors. Six were elected within three years. His account of that change is revealingly unsentimental: talented people were already there. What mattered was being in the conversations where assignments and opportunities were considered, and saying a person's name when habit might have omitted it.

This is also his analysis of hiring at national scale. Companies understandably cannot give elaborate auditions to thousands of applicants, so they rely on proxies. But proxies acquire a life of their own. A requirement copied from an old job description enters an applicant system; the system removes candidates; the survivors receive a skills assessment. The company congratulates itself for assessing skill, without noticing that pedigree conducted the first and largest cut.

The Auguste test

Does this requirement measure the ability to do the job, or merely describe the route taken by people who held it before?

He puts the circularity neatly: “The skills gap becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.” Screen out workers before testing what they can do, reduce their access to jobs where skills grow, then report a shortage of experienced talent. The labor market has managed the bureaucratic feat of misplacing people in plain sight.

Byron Auguste speaking during a virtual Opportunity at Work interview about workforce equity
BYRON AUGUSTE IN A 2024 WORKFORCE-EQUITY CONVERSATION. THE MESSAGE BEHIND HIM IS THE MESSAGE IN FRONT OF HIM: SKILLS HAVE MORE THAN ONE ORIGIN.

Three rooms, one stubborn problem

Auguste left McKinsey in 2013 for the Obama administration, serving as Deputy Assistant to the President for Economic Policy and Deputy Director of the National Economic Council. His portfolio included job creation, labor markets, workforce policy, innovation, infrastructure and investment. The economy was climbing out of the Great Recession, but long-term unemployment remained. He watched a business rule of thumb - that six months out of work made someone suspect - persist even when millions had lost jobs at once.

The contradiction joined three views he had acquired. Economics could identify wasted talent as market failure. Consulting revealed the process constraints and risk aversion shaping employer decisions. Government demonstrated the catalytic power of policy, along with its limits. No one room contained the whole remedy.

Opportunity@Work began in 2015 as a civic enterprise at New America, growing from the TechHire initiative Auguste helped launch in the White House. It became an independent nonprofit in 2016. Its method is deliberately hybrid: research to make overlooked skill legible, data tools to help employers find it, partnerships to change practice, and public language memorable enough to move culture.

70M+U.S. workers classified as STARs
30States acting to remove degree barriers by 2025
$14.8KMedian 2024 wage gain for STARs moving to higher-paying work

The language has done real work. “Non-degree worker” defines a person by an absence. STAR names the presence of skill and the route by which it was built. “Paper ceiling,” the phrase at the center of the campaign Opportunity@Work launched with the Ad Council in 2022, makes an invisible barrier visible. Employers may sincerely want diverse talent and still preserve the ceiling through default settings.

By the time Auguste received the Heinz Award for the Economy in 2025, the campaign had more than 90 partners, and 30 states had committed to removing degree barriers from public hiring. Opportunity@Work reported that STARs had regained more than 750,000 jobs since 2020, following a two-decade period in which they lost access to roughly 7.5 million good jobs. Movement is possible, although the scale of the repair remains considerably larger than its early gains.

The next filter may think for us

Artificial intelligence makes Auguste's argument more urgent. Hiring systems are becoming more capable of reading job descriptions, ranking candidates and recommending career moves. They can notice adjacent skills that a blunt credential filter misses. They can also industrialize old prejudices with admirable uptime.

Opportunity@Work's 2026 State of the Paper Ceiling report treats the labor market as infrastructure. Signals determine who is seen; pathways determine where people can go. Like roads, both reflect design choices. The report found that 37 percent of employers had changed degree requirements and that STARs who moved to higher-paying work in 2024 gained a median of $14,800. It also projects millions of openings through broader pathways and new kinds of work, if employers build access intentionally.

Signals of a changing market

Changed rules
37%
Still to move
63%

Auguste has begun describing AI as “amplified intention.” The phrase refuses the easy fiction that technology arrives with its own moral destination. A screening model optimizes the target it is given. If the target is pedigree in modern dress, the paper ceiling becomes faster and harder to inspect. If the target is demonstrated capability and learnability, software may finally help employers see the talent their older systems discarded.

His position is not that every credential is arbitrary. A medical degree to treat patients and an engineering qualification to design a bridge have obvious purposes. The problem is a generic bachelor's requirement attached to work such as sales, office management, digital marketing or technical support, where it often functions as inherited etiquette rather than job analysis.

“Our research proves that low wage does not equal low skill.

Curiosity with an operating plan

Asked what drives him, Auguste once answered that curiosity matters as much as anything. Then he added that he likes things to work, and finds it irritating when they do not. It is a compact portrait of his public style: the economist's appetite for mechanism paired with an operator's impatience.

That temperament keeps the mission from floating into benevolent abstraction. Opportunity@Work has set measurable ambitions for the next decade: enable upward mobility for one million STARs, open ten million good jobs and increase their earnings by $100 billion. The numbers are large because the category is large. They are also a reminder that announcements about dropping degree requirements are inputs, not outcomes. A rewritten job description matters when someone is hired, advances and is paid more.

The most useful thing to steal from Auguste's work is a question. Whenever an institution says it values talent, inspect the order of operations. Who is removed before talent is measured? Which proxies survived because they were easy to automate? Where could proof replace pedigree?

The paper ceiling is made of countless small decisions: a line in a requisition, a default in software, a familiar school on a shortlist. That is why it can feel permanent. It is also why it can be dismantled. Auguste's wager is that a labor market can learn to recognize how people actually learn. The résumé may keep its place in the ceremony. It will simply have to stop pretending it is the person.