Profile Founder • Executive • Activist • Author • Girl Power Talk began as a phrase, became an app, then a company •

People / The Opportunity Issue

Rachita Sharma Bet Her Name on a Fairer Kind of Work

At thirteen, she dropped a surname to reject an inherited advantage. Years later, Rachita Sharma built a company around the same wager: judge young people by what they can become.

The form arrived in a classroom when Rachita Sharma was thirteen. It asked for the name that would follow her into India’s official machinery: examinations, bank accounts, tax records, a passport. She filled in “Rachita” and left “Sharma” behind. The omission was deliberate. Her surname carried a caste association that could confer status before anybody had considered her character. She wanted no part of that head start.

Her parents were displeased by the administrative ambush. Sharma, by her telling, had found a way to outsmart the system. The gesture was modest enough to fit in a blank box, yet it held the argument that would organize her adult life. An inherited label should not be mistaken for merit. A person should have room to prove herself.

Many founders acquire an origin story after the fact, once success makes the past look unusually tidy. Sharma’s is useful because the line from protest to practice is crooked and visible. She became a campaign coordinator for the youth movement Leaders for Tomorrow in 2013. She tried marketing, social media, and travel writing. She studied mathematical sciences at the University of Delhi, then marketing and finance in an MBA at Thapar Institute. The repertoire widened. The question underneath it did not: who gets trusted, and why?

A test before the titleAt twenty, credibility arrived as a verb

Sharma began working with Blue Ocean Global Technology at twenty. She was soon facing clients, managing large projects, negotiating, and retaining business. The people on the other end did not necessarily know her age or what part of the world she called home. She had to make competence legible through the work itself.

That early exposure helps explain her impatience with the familiar entry-level paradox: employers want experience from young applicants while withholding the responsibility through which experience is made. Sharma’s answer has been to move responsibility forward. Trust comes early, feedback comes often, and titles are less interesting than range.

At Blue Ocean, where she serves as chief marketing officer, her remit spans corporate communications, client engagement, new business, prospective team members, and market expansion. The list has the mildly comic breadth common to an executive in a growing company. It also gave her a laboratory. If a young generalist could learn by crossing boundaries, perhaps an organization could be built to make those crossings normal.

13Age when she omitted her surname
20Age when she began handling global client work
40+Countries in Girl Power Talk’s stated 2024 reach

An idea finds a payrollThe slogan learned to deliver client work

Girl Power Talk did not begin with an office lease or a solemn mission statement. Sharma and Sameer Somal developed the name in 2017. It appeared on T-shirts, became an app, and eventually grew into a company formally registered in December 2019. The route from fabric to software to payroll is charmingly uncorporate. It suggests two people testing where a belief might become useful.

The idea kept finding a larger container

01 / PhraseA plain-language declaration of women’s power.
02 / T-shirtThe message becomes something people can wear.
03 / AppThe identity begins to gather a community.
04 / CompanyPurpose meets clients, jobs, and daily management.

The company sells practical services: digital marketing, public relations, technology, business consulting, and flexible staffing. Its social proposition sits inside the operating model. Young women, men, and nonbinary people are hired, mentored, and moved across areas such as search, design, web development, reputation work, customer support, and client communication. The youngest or newest colleague is supposed to have a hearing when ideas are debated.

In a 2022 portrait of the business, the average employee was twenty-two and team members worked across more than fifteen countries. By 2024, Girl Power Talk described its operations as reaching more than forty. Numbers are the easy part of expansion. Culture has to survive the miles, time zones, and inevitable meetings that should have been emails.

Sharma’s safeguard is an explicit hiring preference for kindness, humility, empathy, character, and willingness to learn, including among candidates with no traditional experience. These qualities are harder to scan than a pedigree and easier to romanticize than to assess. Yet the difficulty is part of the point. A conventional resume makes selection efficient; it can also smuggle old access patterns into a supposedly neutral process.

Rachita Sharma smiling outdoors beside a Girl Power Talk colleague
Work culture, with the fluorescent lights switched off: Rachita Sharma shares a bright afternoon with a Girl Power Talk colleague.

Confidence, made operationalFour pieces of advice with work boots on

Sharma’s public advice on confidence comes in four parts. Cultivate a positive inner voice. Invest in yourself. Embrace your progress. Define your purpose. It sounds neat enough for a notebook margin. Inside her company, each phrase acquires a managerial consequence.

01 / Inner voice

Prepare for criticism without letting it become your private narrator.

02 / Invest

Build knowledge and capability even when the environment is imperfect.

03 / Progress

Measure against your earlier self, then notice what has changed.

04 / Purpose

Choose an end worth pursuing and work backward into daily action.

A constructive inner voice matters when a young employee enters a client call before feeling fully seasoned. Investment requires training and room to move between specialties. Progress depends on feedback that corrects without diminishing. Purpose gives the commercial work a destination beyond another completed task. The system is demanding, because meaningful responsibility always is. Encouragement without authority is merely decoration.

Sharma writes as well as manages. Her subjects form a map of the enterprise she is trying to build: empathetic leadership, financial independence, women in technology, unconscious bias, unpaid internships, African skills markets, staff augmentation, and the difference between a seat at the table and genuine inclusion. The recurring interest is access paired with agency. Entry matters. What happens after entry matters more.

In March 2026, she added risk and failure to that map. Her argument was practical: leadership requires decisions before every variable has settled, and a failed result can become feedback if it is examined early. Women often face heavier scrutiny for the same uncertain move, which makes careful boldness both costly and necessary. The essay fits her longer record. Giving a young person consequential work is a risk. Entering a new country is a risk. Letting purpose influence a commercial decision is a risk. Her preferred response is preparation rather than paralysis.

Purpose meets the invoiceThe awkward, useful middle

There is a persistent tension in a business that speaks both the language of empowerment and the language of client delivery. Deadlines are unmoved by good intentions. A social mission cannot excuse careless work, and a profitable quarter does not prove that opportunity was fairly distributed. Sharma’s answer is to keep both accounts open.

Girl Power Talk uses commercial work to create jobs and development, while its related initiatives support education, community programs, and skills training. Sharma has described the reinvestment of profits in social impact as a collective priority. Girl Power USA, the nonprofit arm, extends that work. The model makes purpose vulnerable to the ordinary tests of management, and therefore open to judgment. Values have to survive budgets, promotions, disappointing drafts, and the third revision of a client presentation.

Recognition has followed. Sharma received a Most Promising Woman in IT honor and an Indian Achiever’s Award for Young Entrepreneur in 2020, a Global Women Inspiration Award in 2022, and the National Alliance for Partnerships in Equity’s Heart and Hope Award in 2024. Awards make tidy milestones. Her own language is less tidy and more durable: change a life one person at a time.

That scale of ambition can sound small only if one has never tried to alter another person’s opportunity set. It requires noticing the quiet candidate, trusting the young colleague with live work, correcting without humiliating, and accepting that talent may arrive without the customary packaging. Repeat the practice across teams and countries, and the apparently small choice becomes infrastructure.

The unfinished experimentA name is only useful when someone gets to make it

Sharma now presents herself publicly with the surname she once refused to write. The old protest has not disappeared; it has matured into a standard she applies to institutions. A name can tell a history. It should not settle a future.

Her aspiration is global, though she has cautioned against expansion as an end in itself. India remains foundational because of its vast young population and the scarcity of meaningful, developmental work available to many graduates. The wider opportunity is to let local young leaders adapt the model to their own countries rather than export a frozen corporate culture.

The wager behind Girl Power Talk is therefore simple to state and difficult to administer: people become capable when they are treated as capable before every credential is in place. Some will stumble. Managers must teach. Clients must still receive excellent work. Merit must be separated from familiarity without becoming another vague slogan.

At thirteen, Sharma used an empty space to deny a system one easy judgment. Her adult work fills that space with harder questions about character, growth, and earned responsibility. A form asks what to call you. A fair workplace asks what you might become, then gives you enough real work to answer.