Breaking serve More than 6 million Canadians played tennis in 2025 504,860 fans attended the 2025 National Bank Open 77 covered courts since 2022 The model: spectacle funds access

Company profile / Tennis / Canada

When Tennis Canada’s $60 Million Summer Vanished, It Exposed the Flywheel Behind the Sport

A two-city tournament pays for courts, coaches and champions across a continent-sized country. The pandemic revealed how fragile that bargain was - and the rebuild offers a playbook for any mission-led organization with one very profitable product.

By YesPress Studio
· 9 min read

On a good August night, the National Bank Open looks like a very expensive way to decide who can keep a fuzzy yellow ball inside painted lines. The stands in Toronto and Montreal fill. Sponsors pour drinks. Broadcasters harvest drama. A teenager in the upper deck decides that tennis is suddenly the only thing worth doing. Then the lights go down and Tennis Canada’s less glamorous work begins: moving the money, attention and ambition from that spectacle into coaching courses, junior competition, wheelchair programs, national teams and courts ordinary people can book.

That transfer is the company’s real product. Tennis Canada is officially a nonprofit national sport association, founded in 1890 and legally known as the Canadian Tennis Association. It governs the game, sanctions competition, selects teams for the Davis Cup, Billie Jean King Cup, Olympics and Paralympics, and runs a development pathway from a child’s first rally to life on the professional tour. But unlike a federation that mainly distributes grants and rule books, it owns and operates a pair of major commercial events.

The men’s and women’s National Bank Open tournaments run simultaneously in Toronto and Montreal, swapping tours each year. Ticket sales, hospitality, partnerships and the value of global attention create a surplus. Tennis Canada reinvests most of the net proceeds in the sport. The show is not beside the mission. The show pays for the mission.

01 / The engineA governing body with a box office

This is what makes Tennis Canada different from its practical competitors. Hockey Canada, Canada Soccer, Golf Canada, Basketball Canada, pickleball, private academies and municipal recreation all compete for some mixture of attention, sponsorship, facilities and family time. Tennis Canada’s advantage is control of a globally relevant live event. It can sell a luxury seat to a bank on Friday and use the margin to help a six-year-old swing a smaller racquet on Saturday.

The customer list is therefore delightfully untidy. It includes tournament spectators, sponsors and hospitality buyers; more than six million Canadians who played in 2025; 4,769 members of its coaching association in 2024; municipalities considering a bubble over outdoor courts; provincial and territorial tennis associations; competitive juniors; and athletes chasing international rankings. One organization has to think like an event promoter, standards body, school, fundraiser, media operation and national-team front office.

6M+Canadians played in 2025
504,8602025 National Bank Open attendance
4,769Coaching association members in 2024

Products organize that mess. Rogers First Set gives children a Try, Learn, Play and Compete ladder using right-sized courts, balls and racquets. The Whole Player Development Pathway maps seven stages and four possible high-performance routes, acknowledging that bodies mature differently and careers do not arrive by conveyor belt. The National Tennis Centre in Montreal and regional centres in Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver support selected prospects. Coach certification spreads consistent practice through clubs. Game. Set. Equity. targets participation, leadership, voice, commercial opportunity and safe experiences for women and girls. Mental Timeout puts psychological health inside the performance conversation.

Victoria Mboko celebrating her 2025 National Bank Open victory
VICTORIA MBOKO, LOCAL FORECAST: a development-system alumna wins the home tournament and makes thousands of children ask for a racquet before breakfast.

02 / The failureThe day the cash machine coughed

Then came 2020. Public-health orders cancelled the flagship tournaments. In a submission to Parliament, Tennis Canada said the events funded 90 percent of its community, grassroots and high-performance investments. Their cancellation removed an expected CA$60 million in revenue. Program cuts, wage subsidies and plans to expand a credit line reduced the projected loss to CA$17 million, but the damage travelled directly toward development.

The pandemic did not reveal that the tournament flywheel was a bad idea. It revealed that there was only one flywheel.The concentration-risk lesson

What failed first was not public appetite for tennis. Outdoor play was one of the easier activities to resume, and participation eventually surged. The failure was financial transmission. No gates meant no commercial engine; no engine meant less money for the slow work that creates the next generation. Tennis Canada had built an unusually self-sustaining national sport organization, but self-sustaining turned out to mean event-dependent.

The shock sharpened a strategic change already visible in the organization: diversify revenue, expand the flagship, become more digital, improve venues, grow donations and public partnerships, and make access itself a product. The 2023-2027 plan called for a 12-day National Bank Open, equal prize money, stronger data capacity and ancillary revenue. In 2025, the expanded tournament drew 504,860 people across both cities. Half the ticket holders were first-timers. Women’s prize money rose from 32 percent of the men’s level to 56 percent, with parity scheduled for 2027.

03 / The constraintYou cannot rally with February

Champions were no longer the only proof of progress. Canada won its first Davis Cup in 2022 and first Billie Jean King Cup in 2023. Bianca Andreescu had already delivered the country’s first Grand Slam singles title in 2019. Yet the more stubborn market problem sits outside the trophy cabinet: a cold country had only about 750 publicly accessible covered courts when Tennis Canada launched its year-round initiative, roughly one for every 50,000 people.

The response is deliberately catalytic. Tennis Canada and Rogers committed CA$5.6 million to help create 160 covered courts across as many as 30 facilities by 2029. Projects can receive up to CA$200,000 in seed money, but local clubs, municipalities and other partners must assemble the rest. By 2025, 15 finished or active projects had produced access to 77 covered courts and an estimated 313,000 additional court hours each year. National Bank’s separate CA$3 million Play Your Court program aims to refresh 100 outdoor courts by 2030; seven projects had added or renewed 34 courts by the end of 2025.

Tennis Canada performance leaders at a 2025 year-end briefing
THE PEOPLE BEHIND THE DRAW: spreadsheets, scouting notes and court calendars - proof that a tennis nation is mostly built by adults sitting near bottled water.

The design choice matters. Tennis Canada is not trying to own every community facility. It supplies money, planning guides, demand evidence and a recognizable national partner. Local operators supply land, operations and community knowledge. This is expansion by enabling, not empire-building.

04 / The changeStop drawing one perfect ladder

Player development changed too. The old Long-Term Athlete Development model evolved into the Whole Player Development Pathway after Tennis Canada studied domestic and international routes to the top 100. The new framework has seven stages, from Active Start to Life as a Pro, and four performance pathways. Its premise is almost comically sensible: one size does not fit all.

That shift is easy to underestimate. Sports systems love a clean ladder because ladders are easy to fund, measure and present in a PDF. Actual teenagers grow at inconvenient speeds. They get hurt, change coaches, attend university, peak late or need a private-club environment rather than a centralized centre. A flexible map lets Tennis Canada coordinate with families, academies and provincial bodies without pretending it controls every variable.

The broader participation system follows the same logic. First Set reduces early friction rather than hunting prodigies at the door. Children use slower balls, smaller courts and suitable racquets. Rookie events are non-elimination and guarantee at least three matches. In 2024, more than 6,000 registrations spread across over 450 events. The product insight is familiar outside sport: shorten time to first success, give novices an obvious next step and do not let one bad experience end the relationship.

Five things worth stealing

  1. Build one visible cash engine. A premium event can subsidize lower-margin mission work better than dozens of disconnected fundraisers.
  2. Publish the loop. Fans and partners should see how a ticket or sponsorship becomes coaching, access or athlete support.
  3. Use seed money, not ownership. Small catalytic grants can unlock municipal land, local capital and operating expertise.
  4. Design the first win. Right-size equipment and guarantee repeat attempts so beginners feel progress before they feel judgment.
  5. Map several routes. A pathway should guide users without forcing every user through the same sequence.

05 / The wagerCan the loop outgrow its star?

The market now supplies a pleasant problem. More than six million Canadians played in 2025, up more than one million from the 2023 study. Nearly 37 percent of 12-to-17-year-olds played, a 14-point jump. Canadian athletes won 65 professional and wheelchair titles in 2025. Victoria Mboko, once in the National Tennis Centre class, won the National Bank Open at 18. Each result pushes attention back into the top of the flywheel.

But attention is rented. Affordable court time, trained coaches and safe programs are owned. Tennis Canada’s next test is whether it can convert the glow of Mboko, Félix Auger-Aliassime and a packed stadium into a habit that survives winter, changing rankings and the inevitable quiet year. Equal prize money must also become more than a tournament number; it has to coincide with who plays, coaches, leads and receives commercial attention throughout the system.

When this model does not work

Do not copy the flywheel if the premium product has no durable demand, the mission and customer base barely overlap, local partners cannot operate what seed funding starts, or one bad year would erase essential services. Cross-subsidy is leverage only when reserves, insurance, diversified income and honest concentration limits sit underneath it.

The cleanest scorecard is not another trophy. It is a family finding a nearby court in February, a coach who knows how to keep a beginner engaged, and a teenager who can see more than one route forward. Tennis Canada has already proved that a home tournament can finance a national ambition. The harder, more interesting job is building enough courts, partners and products that the ambition no longer lives or dies with one summer.