Breaking identityOkta's next user may not be human20,000+ customers7,000+ integrationsFY2026 revenue: $2.919B

Company Profile / Identity Security

Okta and the invisible front door to everything

Every tap on an Okta tile hides a difficult bargain: make access effortless for the right person, and impossible for everyone else. Now the identity company is extending that bargain to machines and AI agents.

The door is rarely the memorable part of a building. Okta has made a business from the digital version: the quick flash of a login screen between a person and the work, money, medical record, customer account, or spreadsheet on the other side. Success often looks like nothing happening. An approved user gets in. A suspicious session gets challenged. A departing employee loses access before their desk chair cools. The software disappears into the routine.

Behind that routine sits a large cloud company. Okta reported $2.919 billion in revenue for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2026, 12 percent more than the year before. It had more than 20,000 customers, including 5,100 spending over $100,000 a year. Two-thirds of the Fortune 100 use its products, according to the company. The clientele runs from small organizations to FedEx, Siemens, Hitachi, Wyndham Hotels, universities, nonprofits, and government agencies.

20K+customers at January 31, 2026
7K+integrations across apps and infrastructure
2/3of the Fortune 100 use Okta

One identity, fewer keys

Todd McKinnon and Frederic Kerrest founded Okta in 2009 after working together at Salesforce. Their timing was precise. Companies were replacing software installed in their own buildings with a patchwork of cloud applications. Every new service brought another account, another password, and another awkward offboarding checklist. Okta offered a central identity layer: connect the applications once, establish policy once, and let users enter through single sign-on.

That original convenience product grew into security infrastructure. Multi-factor authentication asks for stronger proof. Universal Directory keeps identity records in one place. Lifecycle Management creates and removes accounts as people join, move, and leave. Identity Governance handles access requests and periodic reviews. Privileged Access tightens controls around servers and administrative accounts. Identity Threat Protection watches risk signals during a session, not merely at the front door. Workflows automates the administrative glue.

Two platforms, many doors
Employees
Contractors
Partners
SSO · MFA · Governance
Lifecycle · Privileged Access
Identity policy
Customers
Subscribers
App users
Auth0 APIs · SDKs
Authorization · Passkeys
One side arrives carrying an employee badge; the other arrives with a shopping cart. Both would prefer not to discuss passwords.

There are really two front doors. The Okta Platform is sold mainly to IT and security teams managing workforces and enterprise controls. The Auth0 Platform, acquired in 2021 in a stock deal valued at roughly $6.5 billion, is built for developers who want to place authentication and authorization inside customer-facing applications. A hotel can use Okta for staff and Auth0 for guests. A manufacturer can govern employees while offering millions of customers one consistent account across products.

“To get security right, you have to get identity right.”Okta's operating thesis

The problem is larger than passwords

The common shorthand for Okta is “the company that helps people log in.” That is accurate in the way that describing an airport as a place with doors is accurate. The difficult work comes from deciding who may go where, under which conditions, for how long, and what should happen when circumstances change. A familiar employee on an enrolled laptop in Seattle presents one kind of risk. The same credentials appearing from an unmanaged device in another country present another.

Customers buy Okta to reduce password fatigue, retire brittle in-house identity systems, automate account creation, support remote work, demonstrate compliance, and impose consistent policy across cloud and legacy applications. FedEx connected 340,000 team members and more than 250 SaaS, cloud-native, and legacy applications through Okta. During the abrupt move to remote work in 2020, its teams shifted several critical applications in 36 hours. Hitachi uses Okta across roughly 480,000 identities and 1,500 applications. Siemens reports more than five million customer identities secured with Auth0.

Those deployments explain why identity software sits close to both productivity and danger. Make the controls too loose and an attacker may inherit a user's reach. Make them too demanding and every employee becomes an unpaid security clerk. Okta's craft is calibrating friction: invisible when confidence is high, deliberate when risk rises, and documented when auditors arrive.

Subscription gravity

Fiscal-year revenue
$2.610B
$2.919B
FY2025FY2026
The taller bar pays rent every year. Multi-year cloud subscriptions supply nearly all of Okta's revenue.

A recurring toll, not a one-time lock

Okta sells cloud software through multi-year subscriptions, usually shaped by the number of users, selected products, and enterprise terms. Direct sales teams handle many large accounts; cloud marketplaces, resellers, and systems integrators extend distribution. Professional services exist, but they are a small piece of the business. In fiscal 2026, subscription revenue was $2.855 billion of the $2.919 billion total.

The model rewards expansion. A customer may begin with single sign-on and multi-factor authentication, then add lifecycle management, governance, threat protection, or privileged access. More employees and more connected applications increase the platform's usefulness. They also make replacement harder. Okta finished fiscal 2026 with $4.827 billion in remaining performance obligations, its contracted subscription backlog.

The strategy is visible in packaged pricing. A starter workforce plan combines single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, Universal Directory, and a small allowance of workflows. Higher tiers add adaptive controls, governance, privileged access, lifecycle tools, and device security. Large customers negotiate. Developers using Auth0 can start small and scale with active users and features. In each case, identity becomes a meter attached to digital activity.

Neutrality is the pitch - and the test

Okta competes with specialists such as Ping Identity, CyberArk, and SailPoint, as well as IBM, Oracle, Google, and internal systems. The largest shadow is Microsoft Entra ID. Microsoft can package identity beside Microsoft 365, Azure, endpoint management, and a broad security suite. Bundling can simplify procurement and produce an attractive price. Okta counters that an independent identity layer gives customers freedom to mix clouds, devices, directories, and applications without asking one platform owner to referee the rest.

The Okta argument

Independent identity, more than 7,000 integrations, two platforms for workforce and customer use cases, and fewer incentives to favor one cloud or productivity suite.

The bundle argument

One vendor, one contract, native connections, and pricing that can make a standalone identity bill look optional. Convenience is a serious competitor.

The integration network is therefore more than a long compatibility list. It is Okta's physical proof of neutrality and a distribution system shared with thousands of software vendors. The company also integrates identity risk with security partners including CrowdStrike, Palo Alto Networks, and cloud platforms. Its differentiation is strongest in heterogeneous companies - the ones with acquisitions, old servers, several clouds, and no appetite to standardize every tool around a single supplier.

Independence does not erase the burden of trust. Identity providers occupy a sensitive junction, and any service interruption or security incident can spread consequences across customers. Okta's public values now include “Always secure. Always on.” Its Secure Identity Commitment focuses on product investment, hardening corporate systems, customer practices, and industry standards. The emphasis is both a promise and an acknowledgement that identity companies are judged under an unforgiving light.

The next employee never sleeps

Artificial intelligence has widened the category again. Agents can read documents, call APIs, update records, and move among applications on a person's behalf. They need credentials and permissions, yet they do not behave like employees. They can operate continuously, multiply quickly, and take actions at machine speed. A forgotten service account is already a security problem; an autonomous agent with excessive access is a service account with initiative.

Okta for AI Agents and Auth0 for AI Agents aim to discover these identities, establish ownership, grant limited access, and govern what agents may do. Cross App Access addresses the moment one application or agent reaches into another. In June 2026, Okta named more than 25 early adopters across the AI and software ecosystem, including Anthropic, Atlassian, Canva, Cloudflare, Datadog, Docker, Figma, Slack, Supabase, and Zoom. A broader Google Cloud partnership covers agent identity and browser session security.

The July product release moved closer to the action. Agent Gateway is designed to sit between an agent and the enterprise tools it calls, issuing short-lived credentials and preserving an audit trail. Agent-to-Agent Connections applies policy when one agent hands work to another. Okta also signed an agreement to acquire Permiso Security, whose behavioral analytics and threat signals would push the platform further into post-login detection and security operations if the deal closes.

This is an adjacent market, not a guaranteed victory lap. Cloud providers, security vendors, developer platforms, and startups all want to set the rules for agent authorization. Some customers will extend existing systems rather than buy another module. The standards are moving. Okta's advantage is that it already sits between people and thousands of applications. Its challenge is proving that yesterday's trusted checkpoint can understand software actors that make their own plans.

The password may be fading. The need to decide who gets in, what they may touch, and when they must leave is not.

Where Okta fits

In the security market, Okta occupies the identity layer between directories, devices, applications, infrastructure, and people. It is not principally a firewall, endpoint agent, or data-protection tool. It supplies the context those systems need: this actor is known, this device is enrolled, this role permits the action, this session has become risky. In the software market, it is enterprise SaaS with developer infrastructure attached. In the customer-experience market, Auth0 helps make registration and login feel like part of the product rather than a bolted-on checkpoint.

That breadth can be useful to almost any organization with more applications than it wants to manage by hand. A growing company can automate onboarding. A regulated enterprise can document access reviews. A consumer app can add passkeys and social login without inventing an identity stack. A multinational can connect old and new systems behind consistent policy. An AI team can begin assigning ownership and least privilege to agents before experimentation becomes infrastructure.

Okta's best trick remains modest: make a complicated trust decision feel like a small blue button. The company has spent seventeen years expanding what sits behind that button. First came cloud applications, then devices, customers, governance, privileged systems, and threat signals. Machines and AI agents are next in line. The door has not changed much. The guest list has.