The firm that decided a CEO's character was too important to leave to opinion - so it measured it.
// Washington, DC · est. 1991 · Return on Character®
The logo, in the firm's house purple. It sits on a wall in an office where people argue, with regression tables, about whether being a good person shows up in the numbers. It does, they will tell you. They have the study.
Here is a question that sounds soft until you try to answer it with data: does a CEO's character show up on the balance sheet? Most people have an opinion. KRW International, a leadership consulting firm founded in 1991, did the annoying thing and ran the study - seven years of it, across Fortune 500 companies, privately held firms, and nonprofits. The finding, published as Return on Character by Harvard Business Review Press in 2015, is the kind of thing that makes a boardroom go quiet: executive teams rated high on character delivered nearly five times the returns of teams rated low, and ran organizations with 26% higher workforce engagement.
Now, you should be a little skeptical of any firm that sells the thing its own research validates, and KRW would probably respect you for it - their whole pitch is "coaching based on data, not opinion." The useful move here is that they turned a fuzzy word into four observable behaviors you can actually rate: integrity, responsibility, forgiveness, and compassion. You may notice that "forgiveness" is not a word that appears on most corporate dashboards. That is sort of the point. KRW's argument is that the market has been mispricing character because nobody bothered to measure it, and mispricings are where the interesting money is.
Who you are as a leader is more predictive of your impact than what you know how to do.
The name is the founders: Kiel, Rimmer, and Williams. Fred Kiel, a psychologist, was the researcher and public face - his most-watched talk was titled, memorably, "Psychopaths in the C-Suite," which tells you he was not squeamish about the dark side of the finding. If good character compounds, bad character quietly does the opposite, and it takes a lot of shareholder value down with it before anyone writes it in a memo.
Kiel passed away in 2020. The firm he co-founded continues under CEO Kelly Garramone, who joined in 1991 as COO and now runs both KRW International and its affiliated research arm, the KRW Research Institute.
What KRW actually sells is the translation layer. A study is a study; a study you can run on your own board, attach a number to, and turn into one specific thing to change on Monday - that is a product. KRW built assessments, coaching programs, and a coach-certification pipeline around exactly that translation. The idea is not to make you a better person in the abstract. It is to find the single behavior - they call it your Keystone Habit - whose change moves the most downstream.
Whether you buy the causation or read it as correlation, the discipline is worth stealing: before advising anyone, ask what evidence you actually have. Usually the honest answer is less than you'd like.
KRW's Return on Character® assessment rates leaders on four character habits and, crucially, measures the gap between a leader's intent and their reputation - how they are actually experienced by the people around them. The bars below are illustrative of the framework's emphasis, not audited scores.
A 360-style instrument that scores the four character habits and quantifies the gap between how a leader intends to show up and how their reputation reads.
One-on-one coaching grounded in ROC data and predictive analytics, aimed at isolating the single Keystone Habit worth changing first.
Assessments and facilitated development to align senior teams and lift collective effectiveness, not just individual scores.
Evaluations and advisory work focused on board effectiveness and governance - the character question, applied one level up.
Structured onboarding plus multi-session leadership series, including the Accelerator Leadership Series for Teams.
Training and certifying outside coaches to deliver the method - a distribution strategy that extends the research well past KRW's own roster.
Psychologist, lead researcher, and author of Return on Character. His TEDx talk "Psychopaths in the C-Suite" carried the thesis to a wide audience.
Joined KRW in 1991 as COO after careers as a CFO and rehab-services president. Now leads the firm and the KRW Research Institute, translating research into practice.
Eric Rimmer and Kathryn Williams complete the "KRW" - the two other names behind a firm that has spent three decades making character auditable.
Kiel, Rimmer, and Williams start the firm in Minneapolis, adapting a data-gathering model to guide executives.
Harvard Business Review Press releases the book; company records a $100K seed round the same month.
Co-founder and lead researcher passes away; the ROC method and research institute continue his work.
Refreshed brand lists offices in Berlin, Boston, London, Madrid, Minneapolis, New York, Paris, Toronto, Tulsa & Washington DC.
If you're a CEO, a board chair, or an HR leader, KRW is useful in a specific way: it converts a vague worry ("is my leadership team the kind people trust?") into a measured gap you can work on. Run the assessment, find the Keystone Habit, change one thing. It is less flattering than a personality quiz and more actionable than a values poster.
And if you're a skeptic - good. The right questions are about sample size, self-selection, and whether high-character firms simply have other advantages that also produce returns. KRW's answer is the seven-year dataset and a replicable method. You don't have to accept the causation to find the framework worth arguing with, which is more than you can say for most of the leadership shelf.