Type your name into a search box. The gesture lasts perhaps three seconds. The verdict can last for years. An old court story, a false allegation, a photograph copied out of context - all of it may sit above the version of you who woke up this morning. Ealixir Inc. exists in the distance between those two people: the person on the screen and the person in the chair.
The company calls this digital identity management. The plainer description is also the stranger one: Ealixir helps clients alter the collection of links, database entries and stories that strangers encounter first. Sometimes that means asking a publisher or search engine to remove, de-index, anonymize or correct material. Sometimes it means monitoring what comes back. And sometimes it means publishing something new.
A price tag for forgetting
Most reputation companies sell discretion, which tends to make their economics hazy. Ealixir's 2026 public filing does the opposite. It offers a reference menu. The core Removal service is listed at $1,500 per link. WEBiD, an audit of the material attached to a name or identifier, averages $5,000. Ongoing monitoring runs from $500 to $2,500 a month. NewsDelete - work aimed at correcting or removing eligible entries from private compliance databases - is listed at $25,000 per blacklist.
Reference price per unwanted link, with final terms shaped by volume and difficulty.
Average price per person, company, hashtag or other identifier assessed.
Monthly packages rise to $2,500, with custom arrangements beyond that.
Two books, a dedicated website and as many as ten media placements.
At the high end, the menu becomes almost surreal. Event Launch begins at $150,000. Analytics begins at $500,000. Ealixir Story has offered packages at $50,000, $100,000 and $150,000, varying by geography and number of placements. These are not consumer-app prices because this is not, chiefly, a consumer app. It is a service business with software inside it, charging for analysts, communications work, legal knowledge and the slow persuasion of third parties.
Removal is only the first move
A typical job begins with inventory. The company searches for the client, identifies the pages carrying disputed material and produces a report. Its people then decide which mechanism fits: a privacy request, a correction, de-indexation, anonymization, direct contact with a publisher, or no removal at all. The client can follow progress through monitoring tools.
Then comes the second half of the logic. Empty space on a search page is temporary. Ealixir Story commissions articles and distributes them through a network the company says includes more than 1,250 outlets and 250 journalists working in six languages. The desired effect is partly narrative and partly mechanical: give search engines credible, current material to rank. Its newer Editions package takes that idea to a curious extreme, turning authorship into infrastructure with two books, a personal site and media placements.
This breadth is the company's main argument against alternatives such as Reputation.com, Terakeet, BrandYourself, InternetReputation.com and ordinary PR firms. A specialist may remove. An agency may promote. Ealixir wants to inspect, remove, correct, publish and monitor as one sequence. In 2025, however, the old core still paid the bills: Removal generated $3.18 million, roughly 89% of total revenue.
The clients you cannot advertise
Ealixir says it has served more than 500 clients across 28 countries. They include executives, high-net-worth individuals, family offices, professional organizations and small and midsize companies in healthcare, hospitality, blockchain and energy. It is primarily a B2C business built on small, short contracts, yet not evenly distributed: three customers together accounted for about 27% of 2025 revenue.
Confidentiality makes the work hard to display. The cleanest success case is often a page that no longer exists, attached to a client who would prefer not to be named. That leaves the company selling process and principle. Its most consequential principle is a voluntary ethics code. Ealixir says it runs background checks before signing clients and can refuse people convicted of specified crimes involving drugs, terrorism, criminal organizations, or violence against women or minors. The rule is not imposed by law. It is the company's attempt to answer the obvious problem with paid forgetting: some facts remain useful to the public.
The first visible crack, then the boring fix
The most recent two-year accounts show what failed before the new products arrived. In 2024, Ealixir earned $3.36 million in revenue but posted a $402,593 operating loss and a $264,815 net loss. The company had customers and a recognizable service; its cost structure and commercial machinery were not producing a profit.
What changed was less glamorous than the product names. Ealixir standardized sales training, upgraded its CRM and lead-management systems, tightened pricing and follow-up, consolidated vendors, automated internal workflows and reduced reliance on traditional paid marketing. In 2025, revenue rose 7%, gross profit rose 23%, operating expenses fell and the company recorded $101,682 in net income. The turnaround was small, and auditors still raised substantial doubt about the company's ability to continue as a going concern because of recurring losses and its accumulated deficit. But the direction changed.
Google was the old battlefield
The founding insight was about ten blue links. The newer anxiety is a single confident answer. An AI system can synthesize hundreds of sources, including obscure pages a person may never see. Cleaning the first page of search is less useful if the underlying information ecosystem continues to teach machines the old story.
That shift explains RepuTrust, a 2026 beta product that assigns a reputation metric called ReputScore, and EALUMINATE, the proprietary analysis engine announced in May. It also explains why the company added crisis management and why it moved closer to publishing through a 24-month partnership overseeing editorial and advertising activity for Affaritaliani's Rome and Lazio section. Ealixir is trying to move from repairing individual search results to managing the source environment around a name.
The attempt is commercially sensible and philosophically awkward. The same company that helps decide what should disappear is producing material designed to appear. The same AI that makes reputational damage spread faster may become the instrument that scores the repair. The product is control, but control over public information is never neutral.
The useful part you can borrow
You do not need a six-figure campaign to copy the basic sequence. What Ealixir gets right is the order of operations. Reputation work becomes wasteful when diagnosis, removal, replacement and monitoring are treated as one vague activity.
A compact reputation protocol
- Search the exact names, usernames, image variants and old affiliations that others will use.
- Classify each result: accurate, outdated, false, unlawful, irrelevant or simply unflattering.
- Match the remedy to the category. Ask for correction before deletion when correction solves the real problem.
- Publish useful, attributable material on properties you can maintain, not disposable filler.
- Measure again on a schedule. Search rankings change, archives resurface and AI answers draw from different source sets.
There are conditions under which the method will not deliver what a client imagines. A true, current and newsworthy report may remain in the public interest. The United States has no general federal right to be forgotten. A search engine can de-index a page in one jurisdiction while the page itself remains online. A publisher can refuse. A database can correct a record without erasing it. And positive articles do not automatically outrank a well-linked original.
That is why Ealixir's most honest product may be the audit. Before paying to be forgotten, a person has to discover what the internet actually remembers, why it ranks, who controls it and which part can lawfully change. The second first impression is possible. It is simply not magic, and it comes with an invoice.