Breaking - Substack closes $100M Series C at $1.1B valuation Founded 2017 - HQ San Francisco - 111 Sutter St 5M+ paid subscriptions and counting Founders: Chris Best, Hamish McKenzie, Jairaj Sethi Backed by Andreessen Horowitz, BOND, The Chernin Group Top writers reportedly earning seven figures Breaking - Substack closes $100M Series C at $1.1B valuation Founded 2017 - HQ San Francisco - 111 Sutter St 5M+ paid subscriptions and counting Founders: Chris Best, Hamish McKenzie, Jairaj Sethi Backed by Andreessen Horowitz, BOND, The Chernin Group Top writers reportedly earning seven figures
Substack logo
Exhibit A: an orange S that pays the rent for thousands of writers.
YesPress Profile - Company File No. 0042

Substack.
The inbox
is the platform.

A subscription engine for writers, podcasters, and video creators - quietly rewiring how readers pay for what they read.

Series C - $100M Valuation $1.1B Founded 2017 San Francisco
Share this file Twitter / X LinkedIn Facebook Instagram
San Francisco, CA - Filed Today Category - Media / Consumer / SaaS

A laptop, a list, a paywall. That is the entire architecture of a Substack business - and somehow, in eight years, it has been enough to peel writers away from the largest newspapers in the world, fund careers no editor would have greenlit, and convince a quarter-million people to pay for a single email.

Who they are, right now

Walk into the lobby at 111 Sutter Street on a Tuesday morning and you will not find anything that looks like a media company. No green room. No assignment desk. No tortured arguments about chyrons. You will find a small team - around ninety people - shipping a subscription product that, by mid-2026, hosts more than five million paid subscriptions. Substack is, depending on the moment you catch them, a newsletter tool, a podcast host, a video platform, a social feed called Notes, and a quiet little iPhone app that keeps creeping up the App Store rankings. It is also, increasingly, a media company that does not employ a single journalist.

That last part is the trick. Substack does not write. Substack hosts. The writers, on Substack, work for themselves. They keep the list. They keep the relationship. They keep most of the money. Substack takes 10%, the way a literary agent takes 15% and a record label takes everything, and then leaves the rest to the person at the keyboard.

We want to be the economic engine for culture. Not a destination. An engine. Chris Best, co-founder & CEO

The problem they saw

By the mid-2010s, the contract between writers and the internet had quietly collapsed. Ad rates had cratered. Newsrooms were thinning. The platforms that had once promised an audience - Facebook, Twitter, Medium - had each in turn changed the rules: the feed reordered, the partner program shut, the algorithm tilted toward video, then away from it, then toward something else entirely. Writers learned a hard lesson: an audience you do not own is not an audience. It is a lease.

Chris Best and Hamish McKenzie noticed something the larger platforms had missed. Subscribers to Ben Thompson's Stratechery were paying real money - hundreds of dollars a year - for a tech newsletter written by one person from Taiwan. The numbers, when McKenzie did the math, were absurd. Stratechery was bringing in more revenue per reader than most national magazines.

If one writer could do it with a Mailchimp account and a Stripe key, what would happen if you made the toolkit one-click?

Margin Note

The Stratechery moment

Best and McKenzie have repeatedly cited Ben Thompson's Stratechery as the proof-of-concept that launched the company. One subscription, one writer, one inbox. It was less an inspiration than an existence proof.

The founders' bet

Chris Best had just left Kik Messenger, where he had spent most of a decade building a chat app that briefly threatened to become the next WhatsApp. Hamish McKenzie had been a tech reporter at PandoDaily and a writer-in-residence at Tesla. Jairaj Sethi, Kik's head of platform, was the engineer who could actually build the thing. The three of them moved into Y Combinator's Winter 2018 batch with a pitch that sounded almost provocatively boring: a website for paid email newsletters.

Boring was the point. Every part of the product was a deliberate refusal of the era's reigning ideas. No algorithmic feed. No advertising auctions. No virality engineering. No content moderation team trying to decide what was true. Just writers, lists, and a payment processor.

The bet was that good writing is valuable - and that readers, given the chance, would pay for it directly. Hamish McKenzie, co-founder

The product, in plain English

A writer signs up. Picks a name. Writes. Hits publish. Readers can subscribe for free or - if the writer flips the switch - for a few dollars a month. Substack handles hosting, email delivery, payments, and analytics. There is no design to argue with and no template to pay for. Most publications look almost identical, which is a feature: nothing distracts from the words.

Around that core, the product has grown by addition rather than reinvention. Podcasts arrived in 2020. Notes - a short-form feed for writers and readers - launched in 2023 and currently functions as the friendliest neighborhood on the post-Twitter internet. Native video posts followed in 2024. A chat product gives subscribers a back-channel to the writer. The Substack iPhone app, by 2025, had become the way most readers consume the platform.

5M+Paid Subs
$1.1BValuation
10%Platform Cut
~90Employees

A short biography, told in receipts

2017
Best, McKenzie, and Sethi found the company.
2018
Y Combinator W18; first paid subscriber for Bill Bishop's Sinocism.
2019
$15.3M Series A from Andreessen Horowitz.
2020
Pandemic accelerant - high-profile journalists begin defecting from newsrooms.
2021
$65M Series B; valuation crosses $650M.
2023
Notes launches. Community round on Wefunder raises $7.8M from readers and writers.
2024
Native video tools roll out to all publications.
2025
$100M Series C led by BOND at a $1.1B valuation.

The proof

A subscription business is unambiguous. Either people pay, or they do not. By 2026 the answer was clear: they pay, and they keep paying. The top writers on Substack now earn what the platform politely describes as "seven figures" - which is to say, more than they were earning at their old day jobs at The Atlantic, The New York Times, or wherever the rest of legacy media was still picking up the phone.

Paid subscriptions on Substack

Approximate, year-end - in millions
0.05M'19
0.25M'20
1M'21
1.5M'22
2M'23
3M'24
4M'25
5M+'26

Sources - company disclosures, press interviews, investor communications.

The platform's defenders point to those numbers as vindication. Critics point to the same numbers and ask whether Substack has accidentally invented a system that pays the loudest writers the most. Both can be true. The interesting fact is that the writers themselves - the ones being paid - keep showing up. Defectors from one new platform almost never go back to the old one.

I used to write for editors. Now I write for readers. The math, somehow, works out better. Composite of a thousand Substack onboarding stories

The people who built it

Chris Best
Co-founder & CEO

Former co-founder and CTO of Kik. The product brain. Built the original Substack with Sethi in a few months.

Hamish McKenzie
Co-founder & CCO

Former PandoDaily reporter, ex-Tesla writer-in-residence. Author of Insane Mode. The voice of the company.

Jairaj Sethi
Co-founder & CTO

Engineering lead from Kik. Built the platform that kept up with high-profile launches.

The mission

Best has been disciplined about repeating one phrase: an economic engine for culture. The phrase sounds slightly grand for what is, technically, a newsletter tool. But it is doing a lot of quiet work. It says the platform is infrastructure, not destination. It says the writers are the talent, not the product. It says the relationship is between author and reader, and Substack is the toll booth - small, polite, optional.

In a media economy where most platforms compete to harvest attention and sell it, Substack competes for trust and sells access. The two business models barely speak to each other.

Fun Fact

Readers literally own a piece

In 2023, Substack opened a community round on Wefunder and let its own writers and readers invest. They raised $7.8 million. Most platforms have shareholders. Substack has subscribers who are shareholders.

Why it matters tomorrow

A decade ago, the smart money said writing was dead and the only future of media was video, then short video, then short video with AI overlays. Substack made a wildly contrarian bet that long, written, slow, personal media still had a market - and found a generation of readers willing to fund it. Whether that proves to be a permanent shift or a generational one is the open question. The numbers, for now, keep pointing in the same direction.

Substack's next move is not to add a feature so much as to defend a thesis: that the most valuable asset in media is not reach. It is permission. The right to land in someone's inbox. The right to be read.

Where to find them

Watch & listen

A laptop. A list. A paywall.

Walk back into that lobby at 111 Sutter Street. Nothing about the building has changed. The team is still small. The product still looks almost stubbornly plain. But somewhere in the world this minute, a writer is hitting publish - and a reader, somewhere else, is opening an email they paid for.

Engine running. - End of File.