THE LATEST
26 FEB 2026 / Euroclear becomes an investor and client03 MAR 2026 / BNY adopts Vote Connect Global29 APR 2026 / M1 selects FIS Proxy Voting by Proxymity

Company / Fintech · The governance issue

Proxymity wants your shareholder vote to arrive on time

A vote can cross half the financial world before it reaches a company meeting. Proxymity is persuading the banks along the way to give it a faster route - and a receipt.

Advertisement

A shareholder can own a slice of a company, study its directors and decide exactly how to vote, then depend on a relay of financial institutions to deliver that decision. Somewhere between the investor and the annual general meeting, the instruction must navigate accounts, intermediaries and deadlines. Corporate democracy has a back office. It is less photogenic than the boardroom, and considerably more complicated.

Proxymity works in that back office. Its software moves meeting announcements, voting instructions and shareholder identification requests between companies, the institutions holding their shares and the people investing in them. The proposition is pleasingly concrete: get the information from the right place, move it quickly and let the participants see what happened.

The company says its voting service now covers more than 105 markets and serves eight of the ten largest global custodians. Those figures describe reach, rather than a guarantee that every ballot follows an identical digital route. The distinction matters. Proxymity’s story is about connecting institutions, one stubborn piece of financial plumbing at a time.

The startup came from inside the bank

Dean Little and Jonathan Smalley conceived Proxymity in 2017 while working in Citi’s Equities and Securities Services business. They brought experience of the machinery they wanted to change. Smalley had held operational and product development roles at BNY Mellon and Citi; Little had worked in senior roles within Citi’s securities businesses.

Citi’s D10X programme helped develop the idea, and its Tel Aviv innovation lab turned it into a market-ready offering in less than two years. The platform launched in Britain in 2018 after a pilot with Computershare. By 2020 it was becoming an independent company, backed by a group that included institutions accustomed to competing for the same customers.

Dean Little, Proxymity CEO and co-founderJonathan Smalley, Proxymity COO and co-founder
Two people who knew where the paperwork lived. Dean Little, left, and Jonathan Smalley built Proxymity after working inside securities services.Official company portraits

That origin helps explain the strategy. A shareholder voting network needs cooperation from the organisations through which votes travel. The launch consortium included BNY Mellon, Citi, Clearstream, Computershare, Deutsche Bank, HSBC, J.P. Morgan and State Street. Their participation supplied a practical starting point: relationships on both the custody and issuer sides of the process.

A ballot is a round trip

Start with the company holding a meeting. Its agenda must reach investors through the institutions between them. Votes then travel back. Proxymity’s Vote Connect uses meeting information from issuers, issuer agents and central securities depositories, the market infrastructure organisations involved in holding and settling securities. It calls that authoritative input the “golden source”.

The benefit is easy to picture. Every time somebody re-enters or interprets an agenda, there is another opportunity for disagreement. A shared originating record reduces that work. Vote Connect also uses current position information, tracks instructions and supplies post-meeting vote confirmations. For stewardship teams, the receipt belongs alongside the decision: it helps document what happened after the button was pressed.

01 / Follow the instruction

One decision.
Several institutions.

01Company & agentPublish the meeting agenda
02Custody chainConnect holdings and entitlements
03InvestorReview the agenda and vote
04Return journeyLodge, track and confirm
The vote needs a way home. Simplified workflow; the number of intermediaries and available confirmations vary by route.

The suite separates local and international needs. Vote Connect Total serves sub-custodians and other local intermediaries; Vote Connect Global serves institutions operating across borders. The latter launched in November 2023 alongside a new Investor Portal. It combined direct connections with the ability to obtain meeting information and send instructions through local intermediaries worldwide.

That launch also included a power-of-attorney platform. Legal documentation can determine whether an instruction is valid, so the software tracks documents and flags gaps early. It is a revealing product detail. Even a modern voting network must account for an old-fashioned question: who is authorised to act for whom?

“Who owns these shares?” is another journey

A listed company may also need to identify the investors behind intermediary accounts. Proxymity’s Shareholder Disclosure handles requests and responses for banks, brokers and custodians. Its April 2025 expansion extended the offering beyond its established European SRD II capabilities to 14 additional markets, including Australia, Hong Kong and Singapore.

There is more to this than sending a spreadsheet faster. The system checks the request and the requesting agent’s authority before sensitive shareholder information changes hands. It keeps an audit trail and offers both API connections for heavier workloads and an online portal for smaller volumes. That gives operations teams a common process for work otherwise liable to become a collection of messages and exceptions.

The issuer-facing Shareholder Insights Suite looks at the same chain from the other end. It helps companies understand ownership, reconcile disclosure responses and examine voting activity at connected beneficial-owner level. Earlier visibility can give investor relations teams time to contact shareholders before a meeting. It does not settle a disagreement over executive pay; it helps the company see whom it needs to talk to.

The investors are part of the product

Building these connections has required repeated financing. Proxymity’s independent launch came with a $20.5 million strategic investment announced in May 2020. Its Series B began with $31 million in December 2021. BNP Paribas Securities Services added $6 million in March 2022, taking that round to $37 million.

02 / Financing the connections

Capital with an address book

2020 · strategic
$20.5m
2021-22 · Series B
$37m
Feb 2025 · commitment
$26m
Jul 2025 · Series C
$36m
Selected financing announcements in US dollars. Series B includes its extension. These figures are shown separately, not added into a cumulative funding claim.

In February 2025, existing investors committed another $26 million in growth funding. That July, Proxymity announced a $36 million Series C with Mitsubishi UFJ Trust and Banking joining the consortium. The Japanese institution brought more than money: at the time, it represented 20 of Japan’s 30 largest listed companies by market capitalisation as a transfer agent.

Euroclear followed in February 2026, acquiring a minority stake and becoming a client. Its planned integration of Proxymity into corporate actions and governance services extends the pattern. A strategic investor can also be a route into the market. “Modernising shareholder communications requires closer collaboration between infrastructure providers and technology platforms,” Little said in the announcement.

The commercial offering is enterprise software and network services, including partner distribution. FIS Proxy Voting by Proxymity, launched in 2023, is explicitly subscription-based. For a prospective buyer, the useful cost comparison is operational: staff handling, reconciliation, rejected instructions, document chasing and the effort required to integrate a new provider.

A rival, a partner, or both?

Proxymity operates in an established market. Broadridge supplies proxy voting and disclosure services, including ProxyVote for retail investors and ProxyEdge for institutions. Its May 2026 expansion into additional models of tokenised securities is a reminder that incumbent providers are developing their systems too. Digital delivery alone is an insufficient explanation of Proxymity’s position.

Its distinctive pitch is the connection across the custody chain: authoritative meeting information, live position updates, voting nearer the applicable deadline and confirmation from the other end. Those capabilities are best assessed against a buyer’s actual markets and counterparties. A global coverage number is a starting point for that conversation, not its conclusion.

The boundaries are also untidy. Glass Lewis lists Proxymity, Broadridge and Tumelo among its pass-through voting implementation partners. Proxymity connects with ISS as well. Research, voting policy and transmission occupy different parts of the workflow. An investor can use a governance research provider and still have its instructions delivered through another company’s infrastructure.

Distribution arrives wearing a bank’s name

BNY’s March 2026 adoption of Vote Connect Global shows what deployment entails. Proxymity connected with BNY’s sub-custody and agent bank network to complete its global voting coverage. The move followed BNY’s adoption of the Investor Portal, self-service reporting and N-PX reporting capabilities. It was an expansion of an existing relationship, with more connections behind the interface.

A month later, M1 selected FIS Proxy Voting by Proxymity. The wealth platform planned to use it to modernise voting for its customers. Here, Proxymity reaches investors through a familiar financial service rather than requiring them to discover a separate brand. For an infrastructure business, being useful behind somebody else’s screen can be a substantial distribution advantage.

Other collaborations widen the job. A February 2026 agreement with Taiwan Depository & Clearing Corporation addressed cross-border voting. A separate arrangement with Financial Recovery Technologies added class action communications, with FRT contributing claims and recovery expertise. Once institutions are connected, voting need not be the only information travelling between them.

The people behind “real time”

Proxymity’s July 2026 season review provides a less polished view of expansion. It described a demanding US migration, overnight monitoring and operational adaptation by intermediaries. Some investors using two providers could still inherit conservative deadlines. More connectivity made the remaining friction easier to see.

“We came out of it with a few scratches, but we made it.”

Olga McGregor · Senior Manager of Customer Onboarding
Proxymity’s July 2026 AGM season review

The company said those intermediary needs had shaped new features. That is a more useful account of changing direction than a tidy founder epiphany: deployments revealed where existing systems and deadlines needed accommodation. The organisation’s stated emphasis on collaboration meets its practical test in such migrations.

Its 2025 anniversary account described a team of more than 200 and an annual SOC 2 Type 2 audit completed that February without exceptions. Those are different kinds of investment in trust. One concerns people who can support the workflow; the other concerns assessed controls. Neither removes the need to prepare each client connection carefully.

Copy the route before the interface

The lesson for other enterprise builders is specific. Find a process that crosses company boundaries, identify the participants who can make adoption possible, and give each a reason to connect. Proxymity’s consortium, issuer relationships and distribution partners make that approach visible. The network is part of what customers are buying.

For a custody team evaluating the service, follow a representative ballot all the way through. Establish where the agenda originates, which deadline applies, how positions are reconciled and what confirmation returns. Include the documents and exception handling in the exercise. A faster interface offers limited help when a required participant or authority is missing.

Proxymity’s appeal comes down to a modest expectation with serious consequences: an investor should be able to discover what happened to a vote. Shareholder rights are exercised through this machinery. Making the journey legible gives the people on either end something more useful than another promise of speed.

Follow the next connection