Breaking
100,000+ mock interviews logged $50B in offers reported by users Series A: $10M led by M13 (2021) Acquired Byte By Byte (2023) AI Interviewer ships with 200+ problems Top 5% of mock interviewers earn real-interview rights Voice only - no video, no name, no resume 100,000+ mock interviews logged $50B in offers reported by users Series A: $10M led by M13 (2021) Acquired Byte By Byte (2023) AI Interviewer ships with 200+ problems Top 5% of mock interviewers earn real-interview rights Voice only - no video, no name, no resume
YesPress Dossier / Vol. 07 / The Hiring Issue

The blind
audition.

interviewing.io runs the strangest tech interview on the internet: voice only, no name, no resume, no LinkedIn. The candidates love it. The companies, eventually, do too.

interviewing.io logo
Fig. 01 - interviewing.io. San Francisco. The mark on a platform that runs technical interviews the way they should have been run all along.

A senior engineer at Stripe puts on headphones, opens a browser tab, and starts solving a binary tree problem with a stranger she will never meet. No camera. No name. No school. Forty-five minutes later she has a numeric score, a transcript, and - if she did well - a green light to interview at a real company that doesn't yet know who she is. This is a Tuesday on interviewing.io.

A marketplace dressed as a stopwatch.

From the outside, interviewing.io looks like a prep tool. It is not. Prep is the front door. The building is a hiring marketplace - one that flipped the lights off on purpose.

Engineers come to practice. They book a mock interview with someone who has actually given interviews at Meta or Google or OpenAI. They talk through a problem. They get a score. If the score is high enough, they unlock a second door. Behind that door are real first-round interviews at real companies - Uber, Lyft, Quora, Asana - still anonymous. The company sees the performance before it sees the person. By the time anyone learns your name, you have already proven you can do the job.

It is a small inversion that produces a very large result. Roughly half of interviewing.io's placed candidates would not have made it past a resume screen at the same company. They had the wrong school, or the wrong job titles, or a five-year gap, or a name that pattern-matched poorly to the people doing the screening. The platform turned the lights off and the bias went with it.

Founded by the person hiring was broken for.

Aline Lerner did not start out as an engineer. She started out as a technical recruiter, which is to say: she started out watching qualified people get filtered out for reasons that had nothing to do with whether they could write code. She wrote about it - bluntly, with data, on a personal blog at blog.alinelerner.com - and the blog became required reading for an entire generation of people trying to fix engineering hiring.

Then she built the company the blog implied. interviewing.io launched in 2015 out of San Francisco. It went out of beta. It raised seed money from Susa Ventures, Kapor Capital and others. In October 2021 it raised a $10 million Series A led by M13. The pitch to investors was unfussy: technical hiring is a coin flip dressed up as a science, and we have ten years of receipts to prove it.

We know exactly what to do and say to get the company, title, and salary you want. - interviewing.io's actual sales copy. Not a metaphor.

Five things, one philosophy.

If you are an engineer, the platform gives you five doors:

Mock interviews with senior, staff and principal engineers from FAANG, FAANG+ and frontier AI labs. Real interviews at hiring companies once you've proven you can solve their problems. An AI Interviewer for the days you do not want to talk to a human - it runs FAANG-style coding and system design loops and grades like a staff engineer with no patience. Mentorship programs specifically tuned for Amazon, Google and Meta. And the Learning Center: company-by-company hiring guides, a much-cited blog, and an enormous library of replays of other people's interviews so you can watch how the smart move actually sounds.

The catch is the catch.

There is a small, beautiful gating mechanism. The interviewers running mock sessions are themselves rated. Only the top five percent of them are allowed to conduct interviews on behalf of paying companies. The platform applies the same merit test to its supply side that it applies to its demand side. The result is a feedback loop that quietly compounds: better interviewers attract better candidates, better candidates produce better signal, better signal attracts more companies.

The numbers, plain.

100K+
Mock Interviews
10K+
Engineers Hired
220h
Saved Per Hire
~50%
Wouldn't Pass Resume Screen

Fig. 02 / Where Practice Becomes Placement

Approximate share of platform activity, by product line. interviewing.io self-described.
Mock Interviews
88%
AI Interviewer
64%
Real Interviews
42%
Mentorship
28%
Replays / Learn
56%
AL

Aline Lerner

Founder & CEO / MIT '04

A recruiter-turned-engineer-turned-founder who built the company her blog kept arguing should exist. She still writes most of interviewing.io's research and most of its sharpest opinions. She is also the reason the company answers email from aline@interviewing.io - direct, unfussy, on-brand.

A decade of quiet stubbornness.

2015
interviewing.io is founded in San Francisco. Anonymous mock interviews are the only product.
2017
Platform exits beta. "Anonymous technical interview practice for all," as the blog post put it.
October 2021
$10M Series A led by M13. Total raised reaches $13M.
January 2023
Acquires Byte By Byte, folding a respected interview-prep brand into the Learning Center.
2024 - 2025
Ships the AI Interviewer. Publishes widely-cited survey of 63 engineers on how AI is changing technical interviews.

Listen, watch, read.

A short reading list for the curious. Product demos, founder interviews, blog posts the industry has been quoting for years.

Pass it on.

The internet built a tool to find the engineers the internet was hiding. Worth a share.

The engineer at Stripe, again.

The senior engineer from the top of this story finishes the interview. She does not know who she just spoke with - a staff engineer at a company she has never worked for, in a city she has never lived in. She gets her score. It is high. The platform offers her a real first-round at a company she had ruled out months ago because she figured her resume would never make it through.

She accepts. She does another interview, still anonymous. The company says yes. Only then do they trade names. By then the question of whether she was the right hire has already been answered, by her, on a stopwatch, against a problem she had never seen before.

That is the small, quiet thing interviewing.io has been doing 100,000 times. It is not a hack. It is what hiring was supposed to be in the first place.