Breaking
SYNAPSIS AI reads a patient chart in ~0.5 seconds Cleveland Clinic scans 1.2M records, finds 2x eligible trial patients Melanoma screen: 2.5 min vs 427 min for a nurse $10M Series A led by HealthX Ventures ~95% accuracy on unstructured clinical notes Runs inside the hospital firewall - HIPAA + GDPR compliant SYNAPSIS AI reads a patient chart in ~0.5 seconds Cleveland Clinic scans 1.2M records, finds 2x eligible trial patients Melanoma screen: 2.5 min vs 427 min for a nurse $10M Series A led by HealthX Ventures ~95% accuracy on unstructured clinical notes Runs inside the hospital firewall - HIPAA + GDPR compliant
Company Profile · Clinical AI
The wordmark, white on navy. Dyania comes from the Greek for "genius" - a high bar to name yourself after, and they know it.

Dyania Health reads the chart nobody has time to read.

A medically trained AI that turns physician notes, pathology, and imaging reports into answers - in half a second, inside the hospital's own walls.

~95%
Chart accuracy
0.5s
Per record
$10M
Series A, 2024
~45
Team
2020
Founded
Share LinkedIn Twitter / X Facebook Instagram

A clinical research nurse opens a patient's record at 9 a.m. to check whether one person might qualify for one cancer trial. There are scanned pathology reports, free-text oncology notes, imaging impressions, a decade of lab values. By the time she has an answer, it is afternoon. Multiply that by every patient in a health system and you have the reason most clinical trials are slow, expensive, and chronically short of participants. Dyania Health built an AI to do that read in roughly half a second.

"It's not you vs. AI. It's you + AI vs. disease." Dyania Health's framing of what Synapsis is for

The problem they sawMost of medicine's data can't be searched

Roughly 80% of clinical information lives in unstructured text - the things a doctor types, dictates, or scans rather than the tidy codes and lab numbers a database can query. That text is where the diagnosis, the staging, the nuance actually lives. It is also, conveniently, the part no algorithm could reliably read. So health systems did the obvious thing: they paid humans to read it, one chart at a time, forever.

The cost shows up at the worst possible moment - clinical trial recruitment. A trial needs patients who match a long, fussy list of eligibility criteria. Finding them means reading charts. Reading charts means time. Time means trials that drag, miss enrollment targets, or quietly fail to represent the patients they were meant to help.

Eighty percent of the useful data, and it sits in the one format computers were worst at. That is either a tragedy or a business plan. The Dyania thesis, paraphrased

The founders' betFrom $60B in deals to medical NLP

Eirini Schlosser did not come from medicine. She came from Morgan Stanley, where she worked on more than $60 billion in technology, pharma, and consumer transactions before deciding that the interesting problem was in the data, not the deals. She had already founded Chuz, an NLP-powered recommendation engine, when she started Dyania Health in 2020.

Her bet was specific: large language models tuned for medicine - not general-purpose chatbots - could read a clinical note the way a trained clinician does, and do it at machine speed. To make that credible, she paired NLP applied scientists with an in-house team of physicians who design the criteria, assess protocols, and check the work. The leadership bench pulled from Amazon Alexa AI, Bloomberg AI, Flatiron Health, and NYU Langone.

Why the name

Dyania is from the Greek diania (διάνοια) - exceptional intelligence, acumen, genius. The product is called Synapsis. Schlosser splits the company between Jersey City and Athens, which makes the etymology less of a marketing flourish and more of a homecoming.

The productSynapsis AI, and the half-second read

Synapsis AI is a proprietary, medically trained large language model. Point it at an electronic medical record - physician notes, pathology reports, imaging notes, plus the structured labs and codes - and it deduces answers to complex clinical questions at roughly 95% accuracy, in under 0.5 seconds per record. A human doing the same review typically needs 30 minutes or more.

The crucial design choice is where it runs: locally, inside the health system's own firewall. Patient data never leaves the building, which is how Dyania keeps the whole thing HIPAA and GDPR compliant. From that one capability comes a product line - Patient Finder for trial pre-screening, automated chart abstraction for observational studies, study feasibility assessment, and registry reporting that would otherwise eat weeks of staff time.

Synapsis AI

The core medically trained LLM. Reads unstructured + structured records, answers complex clinical questions at ~95% accuracy, ~0.5s per chart.

Patient Finder

Turns records into searchable structured data and precision-matches patients to trial eligibility criteria across the whole system.

Chart Abstraction & Registries

Automates review for observational studies, feasibility, and complex registry reporting - the manual work nobody enjoys.

Three products, one trick: read the note faster and more consistently than a tired human at 4 p.m.

// The short, fast history
2020

Dyania Health is founded

Eirini Schlosser sets out to automate manual medical chart review across Jersey City and Athens.

'24

$10M Series A

Led by HealthX Ventures with Tech Square Ventures and Cleveland Clinic Ventures. Total raised reaches ~$17.55M.

'25

CancerX accelerator

Selected for the public-private program aimed at accelerating innovation against cancer.

'25

Cleveland Clinic goes enterprise-wide

After pilots in cardiology, oncology, and neurology, the clinic rolls Synapsis out across its research system.

The proofThe numbers, before you take their word for it

Claims about AI accuracy are cheap. Dyania's case rests on two trials run with Cleveland Clinic. In a melanoma trial, Synapsis identified eligible patients in 2.5 minutes at 96% accuracy. The human comparisons: a specialized nurse took 427 minutes at 95%, and an oncology nurse took 540 minutes at 88%. Faster and at least as accurate is the only version of this story that matters.

One melanoma patient. Three reviewers.

Minutes to screen a single chart (lower is better) · accuracy noted at right
Synapsis AI2.5 min · 96%
2.5 min
Specialized nurse427 min · 95%
427 min
Oncology nurse540 min · 88%
540 min
Source: Cleveland Clinic / Dyania Health melanoma trial results, 2025. Bars scaled to the slowest reviewer. The AI bar is small on purpose.

The chart that makes a research coordinator's eye twitch - in the good way.

The cardiology result is arguably the bigger one. In the DepleTTR-CM trial, Synapsis analyzed 1.2 million patient records and reviewed 1,476 of them in a single week. It surfaced 30 eligible participants. Standard recruitment had found 14 over 90 days. More patients, found faster, across more sites - which also means a trial population that looks more like the real one.

"The future of medicine depends on building research systems that are precise, efficient, fair, and deeply connected to patient care." Lara Jehi, M.D., Chief Research Information Officer, Cleveland Clinic

The missionUnlocking the data that was already there

Dyania's stated vision is to change how health systems and life sciences companies interact with the unstructured data trapped in clinical records. Put plainly: the insight was always in the chart. The job is to make it readable at scale, without shipping patient data anywhere or asking clinicians to spend their careers as human optical character recognition.

The company says its models consistently outperform human experts at chart review. That is a strong claim, and the honest caveat is that "outperform" depends on the task and the trial. But the direction is hard to argue with: a tireless reader that is fast, consistent, and stays inside the firewall is a genuinely useful colleague for research that has always been bottlenecked on attention.

The skeptic's footnote

Cleveland Clinic is both customer and investor through Cleveland Clinic Ventures, and may benefit from sales of the technology. Worth knowing when you read the trial numbers. The numbers are still the numbers.

Why it matters tomorrowBack to the nurse at 9 a.m.

Return to where we started. The nurse who once spent a morning on a single chart now gets a precision-matched shortlist before her coffee cools, and spends her day on the part of the job that needs a human: judgment, the patient conversation, the consent. The trial that used to crawl fills faster and fairer. The patient who would have been missed gets the call.

That is the whole bet, and it is a narrow one - which is why it might work. Dyania Health did not set out to reinvent medicine. It set out to read the chart. Do that fast enough, accurately enough, and quietly enough to satisfy a compliance officer, and the slowest step in clinical research stops being the slowest step. Forty-five people in Jersey City and Athens are betting the rest follows.